Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGFCX vs RGABX
AGFCX vs RGABX Comparison
Open Charts AGFCX vs RGABX
Alger Responsible Investing C
Price$16.55
Change+$0.16 (+0.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets92.83M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2
Price$74.57
Change+$0.22 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.02B
AGFCX vs RGABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGFCX vs. RGABX commentary
Aug 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGFCX is a Buy and RGABX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGABX has more cash in the bank: 324B vs. AGFCX (92.8M). AGFCX (0.00) and RGABX (0.00) have matching dividends . AGFCX was incepted earlier than RGABX: AGFCX (17 years) vs RGABX (23 years). AGFCX (2.03) is less costly to investors than RGABX (1.39). RGABX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. AGFCX (9.02). RGABX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGFCX: RGABX (250) vs AGFCX (1000). AGFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.94 vs. RGABX (16.61). AGFCX (35.01) and RGABX (34.72) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AGFCX | RGABX | AGFCX / RGABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.39 | 146% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.03 | 1.39 | 146% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.893 | 12.270 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 92.8M | 324B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.94 | 16.61 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.54 | 41.96 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.01 | 34.72 | 101% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.83 | 70.52 | 122% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement