AGLXY
Price
$6.60
Change
-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
5.5B
17 days until earnings call
CKISF
Price
$6.66
Change
+$0.11 (+1.68%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.33B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGLXY vs CKISF

Header iconAGLXY vs CKISF Comparison
Open Charts AGLXY vs CKISFBanner chart's image
AGL Energy
Price$6.60
Change-$0.01 (-0.15%)
Volume$866
Capitalization5.5B
CK Infrastructure Holdings
Price$6.66
Change+$0.11 (+1.68%)
Volume$500
Capitalization13.33B
AGLXY vs CKISF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AGLXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CKISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGLXY vs. CKISF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGLXY is a Hold and CKISF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AGLXY: $6.60 vs. CKISF: $6.66)
Brand notoriety: AGLXY and CKISF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electric Utilities industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGLXY: 16% vs. CKISF: 67%
Market capitalization -- AGLXY: $5.5B vs. CKISF: $13.33B
AGLXY [@Electric Utilities] is valued at $5.5B. CKISF’s [@Electric Utilities] market capitalization is $13.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electric Utilities] industry ranges from $131.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electric Utilities] industry is $18.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGLXY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCKISF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AGLXY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CKISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AGLXY is a better buy in the long-term than CKISF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGLXY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CKISF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGLXY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CKISF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CKISF is a better buy in the short-term than AGLXY.

Price Growth

AGLXY (@Electric Utilities) experienced а +1.85% price change this week, while CKISF (@Electric Utilities) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electric Utilities industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.33%.

Reported Earning Dates

AGLXY is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

CKISF is expected to report earnings on Apr 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electric Utilities (+1.20% weekly)

Electric utilities companies generate, transmit and distribute electricity to businesses/offices and residences. Companies may be owned by the government or investors or public shareholders, or a combination thereof. The industry also includes firms that buy and sell electricity. Companies in this industry typically require significant investments in infrastructure. Many firms in this industry pay substantial and regular dividends to shareholders. However, changes in interest rates (and their impact on debt burdens), natural disasters and changing commodity prices could be factors affecting energy utilities’ profit margins. NextEra Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Corporation, Dominion Energy Inc. and Southern Company are among U.S. electric utilities companies with the largest market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CKISF($13.3B) has a higher market cap than AGLXY($5.5B). CKISF has higher P/E ratio than AGLXY: CKISF (12.84) vs AGLXY (5.30). AGLXY YTD gains are higher at: -5.031 vs. CKISF (-7.465). CKISF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.98B vs. AGLXY (-180M). AGLXY has higher revenues than CKISF: AGLXY (15.1B) vs CKISF (6.84B).
AGLXYCKISFAGLXY / CKISF
Capitalization5.5B13.3B41%
EBITDA-180M9.98B-2%
Gain YTD-5.031-7.46567%
P/E Ratio5.3012.8441%
Revenue15.1B6.84B221%
Total CashN/A9.59B-
Total DebtN/A28.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGLXY vs CKISF: Fundamental Ratings
AGLXY
CKISF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5046
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
9798
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5960
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1663
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AGLXY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISF (51). This means that AGLXY’s stock grew similarly to CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

CKISF's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGLXY (100). This means that CKISF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGLXY’s over the last 12 months.

AGLXY's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISF (98). This means that AGLXY’s stock grew similarly to CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

AGLXY's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as CKISF (60). This means that AGLXY’s stock grew similarly to CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

AGLXY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CKISF (63). This means that AGLXY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CKISF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGLXYCKISF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGLXY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CKISF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUGT79.001.63
+2.11%
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X ETF
GFGF33.380.08
+0.24%
Guru Favorite Stocks ETF
QYLD16.750.04
+0.24%
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
HYTR21.730.01
+0.05%
Counterpoint High Yield Trend ETF
PMFB25.66N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - February

AGLXY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AGLXY and POR have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGLXY and POR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGLXY
1D Price
Change %
AGLXY100%
-0.23%
POR - AGLXY
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.20%
AEE - AGLXY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
D - AGLXY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGLNF - AGLXY
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDUAF - AGLXY
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
More

CKISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CKISF and CHUEF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CKISF and CHUEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CKISF
1D Price
Change %
CKISF100%
N/A
CHUEF - CKISF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
CLPHY - CKISF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGLXY - CKISF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
CDUAF - CKISF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
CKISY - CKISF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More