Ad is loading...
AGPPF
Price
$33.70
Change
-$2.10 (-5.87%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
GSISF
Price
$1.45
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

AGPPF vs GSISF

Header iconAGPPF vs GSISF Comparison
Open Charts AGPPF vs GSISFBanner chart's image
Anglo American Platinum
Price$33.70
Change-$2.10 (-5.87%)
Volume$1
CapitalizationN/A
Genesis Minerals
Price$1.45
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.02K
CapitalizationN/A
AGPPF vs GSISF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGPPF vs. GSISF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGPPF is a Hold and GSISF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AGPPF: $33.70 vs. GSISF: $1.45)
Brand notoriety: AGPPF and GSISF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGPPF: 0% vs. GSISF: 225%
Market capitalization -- AGPPF: $13.35B vs. GSISF: $1.02B
AGPPF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $13.35B. GSISF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.02B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGPPF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGSISF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AGPPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GSISF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AGPPF is a better buy in the long-term than GSISF.

Price Growth

AGPPF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.46% price change this week, while GSISF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -2.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.76%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-2.08% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGPPF($13.3B) has a higher market cap than GSISF($1.02B). AGPPF has higher P/E ratio than GSISF: AGPPF (7.27) vs GSISF (0.99). GSISF YTD gains are higher at: 20.833 vs. AGPPF (-35.498). AGPPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 47.1B vs. GSISF (-40.57M). AGPPF has more cash in the bank: 32.1B vs. GSISF (11.1M). AGPPF has higher revenues than GSISF: AGPPF (143B) vs GSISF (11M).
AGPPFGSISFAGPPF / GSISF
Capitalization13.3B1.02B1,306%
EBITDA47.1B-40.57M-116,104%
Gain YTD-35.49820.833-170%
P/E Ratio7.270.99734%
Revenue143B11M1,300,000%
Total Cash32.1B11.1M289,189%
Total Debt7.74BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGPPF: Fundamental Ratings
AGPPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
28
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
78
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
46

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GICCX12.46-0.04
-0.32%
Goldman Sachs Intl Sm Cp Insghts C
PSVKX19.90-0.18
-0.90%
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R4
IGIAX103.39-1.00
-0.96%
Integrity Growth & Income Fund A
CICAX61.20-0.84
-1.35%
American Funds Invmt Co of Amer 529A
WFDSX33.92-0.60
-1.74%
Allspring SMID Cap Growth Fund - Cl Inst

AGPPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AGPPF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGPPF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGPPF
1D Price
Change %
AGPPF100%
-5.86%
GSISF - AGPPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBSW - AGPPF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.97%
XPRCF - AGPPF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGXKF - AGPPF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABNAF - AGPPF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GSISF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSISF has been loosely correlated with DTARF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSISF jumps, then DTARF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSISF
1D Price
Change %
GSISF100%
N/A
DTARF - GSISF
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.45%
PDLMF - GSISF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STBMF - GSISF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHGOF - GSISF
30%
Poorly correlated
-7.98%
VMSSF - GSISF
26%
Poorly correlated
+22.20%
More