Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGRFX vs GFACX
AGRFX vs GFACX Comparison
Open Charts AGRFX vs GFACX
AGRFX vs GFACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGRFX vs. GFACX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRFX is a Buy and GFACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GFACX has more cash in the bank: 338B vs. AGRFX (1.61B). AGRFX (0.00) and GFACX (0.00) have matching dividends . AGRFX was incepted earlier than GFACX: AGRFX (36 years) vs GFACX (25 years). GFACX (1.35) is less costly to investors than AGRFX (1.10). AGRFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.00 vs. GFACX (32.00). GFACX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGRFX: GFACX (250) vs AGRFX (2500). GFACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.09 vs. AGRFX (2.89). GFACX return over 5 years is better than : 14.79 vs. AGRFX (5.78).
| AGRFX | GFACX | AGRFX / GFACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.35 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.10 | 1.35 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 36 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.476 | 10.104 | 84% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.61B | 338B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.89 | 12.09 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.06 | 44.36 | 45% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.78 | 14.79 | 39% |
| Returns for 10 years | 90.91 | 88.17 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement