It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGYS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNATL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGYS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NATL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AGYS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -5.59% price change this week, while NATL (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.13%.
AGYS is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2025.
NATL is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
AGYS | NATL | AGYS / NATL | |
Capitalization | 2.31B | 1.41B | 164% |
EBITDA | 23.5M | 451M | 5% |
Gain YTD | -45.798 | -23.909 | 192% |
P/E Ratio | 26.19 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 228M | 4.19B | 5% |
Total Cash | 116M | 339M | 34% |
Total Debt | 24.1M | 3.12B | 1% |
AGYS | NATL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 76 | 16 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 47 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 44 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 53 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NATL's Valuation (58) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as AGYS (80) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NATL’s stock grew similarly to AGYS’s over the last 12 months.
AGYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NATL (97) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NATL’s over the last 12 months.
NATL's SMR Rating (29) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGYS (72) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NATL’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGYS’s over the last 12 months.
NATL's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGYS (84) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that NATL’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGYS’s over the last 12 months.
AGYS's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NATL (44) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew somewhat faster than NATL’s over the last 12 months.
AGYS | NATL | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago83% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago64% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago71% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago75% | 3 days ago73% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago77% | 5 days ago81% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | 2 days ago78% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
TSPFX | 5.69 | N/A | N/A |
Transamerica Small Cap Growth R4 | |||
RYPNX | 13.77 | N/A | N/A |
Royce Small-Cap Opportunity Invmt | |||
CMTFX | 81.72 | N/A | N/A |
Columbia Global Technology Growth Inst | |||
BAREX | 15.22 | N/A | N/A |
BlackRock Real Estate Securities Inv A | |||
CNWFX | 75.85 | -1.84 | -2.37% |
American Funds New World 529F |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGYS has been loosely correlated with WK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGYS jumps, then WK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AGYS | 100% | -4.35% | ||
WK - AGYS | 51% Loosely correlated | -10.20% | ||
DJCO - AGYS | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.99% | ||
TREIF - AGYS | 45% Loosely correlated | -4.99% | ||
ACIW - AGYS | 43% Loosely correlated | -6.49% | ||
OLO - AGYS | 43% Loosely correlated | -5.17% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NATL has been loosely correlated with EEFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NATL jumps, then EEFT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NATL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
NATL | 100% | -9.12% | ||
EEFT - NATL | 43% Loosely correlated | -6.43% | ||
DJCO - NATL | 42% Loosely correlated | -4.99% | ||
UPBD - NATL | 41% Loosely correlated | -9.69% | ||
AGYS - NATL | 40% Loosely correlated | -4.35% | ||
SPSC - NATL | 39% Loosely correlated | -5.83% | ||
More |