Ad is loading...
AIFLF
Price
$3.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
LFLS
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

AIFLF vs LFLS

Header iconAIFLF vs LFLS Comparison
Open Charts AIFLF vs LFLSBanner chart's image
Aiful
Price$3.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Loans4Less.com
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.58K
CapitalizationN/A
AIFLF vs LFLS Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIFLF vs. LFLS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIFLF is a Hold and LFLS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AIFLF: $3.05 vs. LFLS: $0.03)
Brand notoriety: AIFLF and LFLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIFLF: 100% vs. LFLS: 52%
Market capitalization -- AIFLF: $1.23B vs. LFLS: $0
AIFLF [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.23B. LFLS’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIFLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLFLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIFLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LFLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIFLF is a better buy in the long-term than LFLS.

Price Growth

AIFLF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LFLS (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +34.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-1.17% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LFLS YTD gains are higher at: 150.000 vs. AIFLF (65.761).
AIFLFLFLSAIFLF / LFLS
Capitalization1.23BN/A-
EBITDA15BN/A-
Gain YTD65.761150.00044%
P/E Ratio7.62N/A-
Revenue141BN/A-
Total Cash61.7BN/A-
Total Debt547BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
LFLS: Fundamental Ratings
LFLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBALX13.57-0.05
-0.37%
Davenport Balanced Income
FRIEX15.54-0.12
-0.77%
Federated Hermes Emerging Markets Eq R6
FCEUX18.53-0.25
-1.33%
Franklin U.S. Core Equity Advisor
PGBEX45.80-0.95
-2.03%
Principal Blue Chip R3
NLCCX33.16-0.84
-2.47%
Voya Large-Cap Growth C

AIFLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AIFLF and DWIS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AIFLF and DWIS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIFLF
1D Price
Change %
AIFLF100%
N/A
DWIS - AIFLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-17.75%
SNTG - AIFLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.38%
ZIZTF - AIFLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
RWAY - AIFLF
1%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
OPFI - AIFLF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More

LFLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LFLS and ZCAR have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LFLS and ZCAR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LFLS
1D Price
Change %
LFLS100%
N/A
ZCAR - LFLS
28%
Poorly correlated
-5.11%
DWAY - LFLS
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZIZTF - LFLS
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.28%
OPFI - LFLS
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
AIFLF - LFLS
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More