AIMAU
Price
$12.00
Change
+$0.04 (+0.33%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
RFAC
Price
$11.45
Change
+$0.10 (+0.88%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
77.65M
Ad is loading...

AIMAU vs RFAC

Header iconAIMAU vs RFAC Comparison
Open Charts AIMAU vs RFACBanner chart's image
Aimfinity Investment
Price$12.00
Change+$0.04 (+0.33%)
Volume$4.49K
CapitalizationN/A
RF Acquisition
Price$11.45
Change+$0.10 (+0.88%)
Volume$67.19K
Capitalization77.65M
AIMAU vs RFAC Comparison Chart
Loading...
AIMAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RFAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AIMAU vs. RFAC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AIMAU is a Hold and RFAC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AIMAU: $12.00 vs. RFAC: $11.45)
Brand notoriety: AIMAU and RFAC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AIMAU: 475% vs. RFAC: 1240%
Market capitalization -- AIMAU: $0 vs. RFAC: $77.65M
AIMAU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. RFAC’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $77.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AIMAU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRFAC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AIMAU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RFAC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AIMAU is a better buy in the long-term than RFAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AIMAU’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RFAC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AIMAU’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • RFAC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RFAC is a better buy in the short-term than AIMAU.

Price Growth

AIMAU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -7.62% price change this week, while RFAC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

AIMAU is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2023.

RFAC is expected to report earnings on Apr 26, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.19% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RFAC YTD gains are higher at: -0.174 vs. AIMAU (-7.193). AIMAU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.61M vs. RFAC (-2.2M). AIMAU has more cash in the bank: 5.5K vs. RFAC (4.07K). AIMAU has less debt than RFAC: AIMAU (255K) vs RFAC (793K). AIMAU (0) and RFAC (0) have equivalent revenues.
AIMAURFACAIMAU / RFAC
CapitalizationN/A77.6M-
EBITDA-1.61M-2.2M73%
Gain YTD-7.193-0.1744,125%
P/E RatioN/A540.50-
Revenue00-
Total Cash5.5K4.07K135%
Total Debt255K793K32%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AIMAURFAC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
4%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
13%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
31%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
21%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
23%
N/A
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
26%
N/A
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 27 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
4%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AIMAU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RFAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QTENX10.360.08
+0.78%
AQR Emerging Multi-Style II N
BOSOX18.420.06
+0.33%
Boston Trust Walden Small Cap
BNUEX10.160.03
+0.30%
UBS International Sustainable Equity P
SVFCX79.350.18
+0.23%
Smead Value C
SGHIX10.490.01
+0.10%
Sextant Global High Income

AIMAU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AIMAU has been loosely correlated with BEEP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AIMAU jumps, then BEEP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AIMAU
1D Price
Change %
AIMAU100%
N/A
BEEP - AIMAU
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.77%
BOWN - AIMAU
25%
Poorly correlated
+14.84%
CSLMU - AIMAU
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPKLU - AIMAU
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RFAC - AIMAU
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.88%
More

RFAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFAC has been loosely correlated with CLBR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFAC jumps, then CLBR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RFAC
1D Price
Change %
RFAC100%
+0.88%
CLBR - RFAC
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.18%
JWSMF - RFAC
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FACT - RFAC
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
PEGR - RFAC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HYAC - RFAC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More