AKA
Price
$11.09
Change
-$1.12 (-9.17%)
Updated
Apr 9, 02:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
130.56M
W
Price
$28.49
Change
+$4.35 (+18.02%)
Updated
Apr 9, 02:46 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.06B
22 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AKA vs W

Header iconAKA vs W Comparison
Open Charts AKA vs WBanner chart's image
aka Brands Holding
Price$11.09
Change-$1.12 (-9.17%)
Volume$100
Capitalization130.56M
Wayfair
Price$28.49
Change+$4.35 (+18.02%)
Volume$18.27K
Capitalization3.06B
AKA vs W Comparison Chart
Loading...
AKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AKA vs. W commentary
Apr 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AKA is a Hold and W is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 09, 2025
Stock price -- (AKA: $12.21 vs. W: $24.14)
Brand notoriety: AKA: Not notable vs. W: Notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AKA: 38% vs. W: 203%
Market capitalization -- AKA: $130.56M vs. W: $3.06B
AKA [@Internet Retail] is valued at $130.56M. W’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $3.06B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $1.81T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $35.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AKA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AKA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • W’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AKA is a better buy in the long-term than W.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AKA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while W’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AKA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • W’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, W is a better buy in the short-term than AKA.

Price Growth

AKA (@Internet Retail) experienced а -19.57% price change this week, while W (@Internet Retail) price change was -24.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -8.72%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

AKA is expected to report earnings on Nov 08, 2023.

W is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-8.72% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
W($3.07B) has a higher market cap than AKA($131M). AKA YTD gains are higher at: -34.776 vs. W (-45.532). AKA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.23M vs. W (-66M). W has more cash in the bank: 1.37B vs. AKA (24.2M). AKA has less debt than W: AKA (184M) vs W (4.22B). W has higher revenues than AKA: W (11.9B) vs AKA (575M).
AKAWAKA / W
Capitalization131M3.07B4%
EBITDA6.23M-66M-9%
Gain YTD-34.776-45.53276%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue575M11.9B5%
Total Cash24.2M1.37B2%
Total Debt184M4.22B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
W: Fundamental Ratings
W
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
80
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AKAW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AKA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABWAX14.07N/A
N/A
AB All Market Total Return A
CIGYX9.64N/A
N/A
AB Concentrated International Growth Adv
PFPWX46.36N/A
N/A
Parnassus Value Equity Institutional
BIVIX17.09N/A
N/A
Invenomic Institutional
MSVEX4.91N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Vitality Portfolio A

AKA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AKA and CVNA have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AKA and CVNA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AKA
1D Price
Change %
AKA100%
-2.55%
CVNA - AKA
27%
Poorly correlated
+5.03%
W - AKA
22%
Poorly correlated
-12.03%
BABA - AKA
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.24%
ETSY - AKA
21%
Poorly correlated
-6.51%
VIPS - AKA
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.22%
More