Ad is loading...
AKEMF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
NPTLF
Price
$6.28
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 27 closing price
Ad is loading...

AKEMF vs NPTLF

Header iconAKEMF vs NPTLF Comparison
Open Charts AKEMF vs NPTLFBanner chart's image
ALASKA ENERGY METALS
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$286.84K
CapitalizationN/A
NORTHAM PLATINUM
Price$6.28
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
AKEMF vs NPTLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AKEMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AKEMF vs. NPTLF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AKEMF is a StrongSell and NPTLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AKEMF: $0.10 vs. NPTLF: $6.28)
Brand notoriety: AKEMF and NPTLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AKEMF: 58% vs. NPTLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AKEMF: $10.32M vs. NPTLF: $3.34B
AKEMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $10.32M. NPTLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $3.34B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AKEMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPTLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AKEMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPTLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NPTLF is a better buy in the long-term than AKEMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AKEMF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AKEMF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

AKEMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -3.53% price change this week, while NPTLF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.50% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NPTLF($3.34B) has a higher market cap than AKEMF($10.3M). NPTLF YTD gains are higher at: -11.798 vs. AKEMF (-65.367).
AKEMFNPTLFAKEMF / NPTLF
Capitalization10.3M3.34B0%
EBITDAN/A20B-
Gain YTD-65.367-11.798554%
P/E RatioN/A0.07-
RevenueN/A40.3B-
Total CashN/A121M-
Total DebtN/A24.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AKEMF: Fundamental Ratings
AKEMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
85
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AKEMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AKEMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FGIKX64.30-0.47
-0.73%
Fidelity Growth & Income K
PJORX17.76-0.13
-0.73%
PGIM Jennison Focused Value R
JETIX14.67-0.15
-1.01%
abrdn Global Equity Impact Instl
PXWIX34.74-0.48
-1.36%
Impax Ellevate Global Women's Ldr Instl
GTSYX32.66-0.54
-1.63%
Invesco Small Cap Growth Y

AKEMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AKEMF has been loosely correlated with RVTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AKEMF jumps, then RVTI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AKEMF
1D Price
Change %
AKEMF100%
-1.05%
RVTI - AKEMF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TGMR - AKEMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TETOF - AKEMF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.99%
EMUSF - AKEMF
11%
Poorly correlated
+7.05%
NPTLF - AKEMF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NPTLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NPTLF has been loosely correlated with GNGXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NPTLF jumps, then GNGXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPTLF
1D Price
Change %
NPTLF100%
N/A
GNGXF - NPTLF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CALRF - NPTLF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GXXFF - NPTLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-7.07%
NSGCF - NPTLF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DOLLF - NPTLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
More