AL
Price
$46.23
Change
+$0.39 (+0.85%)
Updated
Apr 28, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.7B
7 days until earnings call
FCMGF
Price
$8.18
Change
-$0.07 (-0.85%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
291.91M
Ad is loading...

AL vs FCMGF

Header iconAL vs FCMGF Comparison
Open Charts AL vs FCMGFBanner chart's image
Air Lease
Price$46.23
Change+$0.39 (+0.85%)
Volume$6.27K
Capitalization5.7B
Firm Capital Mortgage Investment
Price$8.18
Change-$0.07 (-0.85%)
Volume$400
Capitalization291.91M
AL vs FCMGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AL vs. FCMGF commentary
Apr 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AL is a StrongBuy and FCMGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 28, 2025
Stock price -- (AL: $45.84 vs. FCMGF: $8.18)
Brand notoriety: AL and FCMGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AL: 95% vs. FCMGF: 60%
Market capitalization -- AL: $5.7B vs. FCMGF: $291.91M
AL [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.7B. FCMGF’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $291.91M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFCMGF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FCMGF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AL and FCMGF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

AL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +8.01% price change this week, while FCMGF (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +5.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +33.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

AL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+5.87% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AL($5.7B) has a higher market cap than FCMGF($292M). FCMGF has higher P/E ratio than AL: FCMGF (11.58) vs AL (9.96). FCMGF YTD gains are higher at: -2.908 vs. AL (-4.467). FCMGF has less debt than AL: FCMGF (183M) vs AL (19.2B). AL has higher revenues than FCMGF: AL (2.69B) vs FCMGF (50.5M).
ALFCMGFAL / FCMGF
Capitalization5.7B292M1,952%
EBITDA1.88BN/A-
Gain YTD-4.467-2.908154%
P/E Ratio9.9611.5886%
Revenue2.69B50.5M5,317%
Total Cash461MN/A-
Total Debt19.2B183M10,492%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AL vs FCMGF: Fundamental Ratings
AL
FCMGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2875
SMR RATING
1..100
8318
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5753
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1546
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a16

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AL's Valuation (50) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCMGF (50) in the null industry. This means that AL’s stock grew similarly to FCMGF’s over the last 12 months.

AL's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCMGF (75) in the null industry. This means that AL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCMGF’s over the last 12 months.

FCMGF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AL (83) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FCMGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

FCMGF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as AL (57) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FCMGF’s stock grew similarly to AL’s over the last 12 months.

AL's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FCMGF (46) in the null industry. This means that AL’s stock grew similarly to FCMGF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MMLG28.140.36
+1.30%
First Trust Multi-Manager Large Gr ETF
USVN48.240.18
+0.37%
US Treasury 7 Year Note ETF
IBDT25.270.04
+0.16%
iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corp ETF
SIO25.70N/A
N/A
Touchstone Strategic Income ETF
ONEV122.37-0.41
-0.33%
SPDR® Russell 1000 Low Vol Foc ETF

FCMGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FCMGF and BRLGF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FCMGF and BRLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCMGF
1D Price
Change %
FCMGF100%
N/A
BRLGF - FCMGF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGRC - FCMGF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.62%
ASHTY - FCMGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
TBCRF - FCMGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AL - FCMGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More