AL
Price
$45.59
Change
+$1.44 (+3.26%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.7B
11 days until earnings call
WD
Price
$76.35
Change
+$1.04 (+1.38%)
Updated
Apr 24, 02:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.4B
7 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AL vs WD

Header iconAL vs WD Comparison
Open Charts AL vs WDBanner chart's image
Air Lease
Price$45.59
Change+$1.44 (+3.26%)
Volume$2.36K
Capitalization5.7B
Walker & Dunlop
Price$76.35
Change+$1.04 (+1.38%)
Volume$757
Capitalization3.4B
AL vs WD Comparison Chart
Loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AL vs. WD commentary
Apr 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AL is a StrongBuy and WD is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 24, 2025
Stock price -- (AL: $44.15 vs. WD: $75.31)
Brand notoriety: AL and WD are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AL: 95% vs. WD: 61%
Market capitalization -- AL: $5.7B vs. WD: $3.4B
AL [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $5.7B. WD’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $3.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AL is a better buy in the long-term than WD.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AL’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WD’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AL’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WD is a better buy in the short-term than AL.

Price Growth

AL (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +5.67% price change this week, while WD (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +2.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +4.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.55%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

AL is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

WD is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+4.07% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AL($5.7B) has a higher market cap than WD($3.4B). WD has higher P/E ratio than AL: WD (31.03) vs AL (9.96). AL YTD gains are higher at: -7.989 vs. WD (-21.913). AL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.88B vs. WD (364M). AL has more cash in the bank: 461M vs. WD (329M). WD has less debt than AL: WD (1.47B) vs AL (19.2B). AL has higher revenues than WD: AL (2.69B) vs WD (1.05B).
ALWDAL / WD
Capitalization5.7B3.4B168%
EBITDA1.88B364M515%
Gain YTD-7.989-21.91336%
P/E Ratio9.9631.0332%
Revenue2.69B1.05B255%
Total Cash461M329M140%
Total Debt19.2B1.47B1,305%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AL vs WD: Fundamental Ratings
AL
WD
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7210
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2961
SMR RATING
1..100
8381
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7382
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1669
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WD's Valuation (31) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AL (88). This means that WD’s stock grew somewhat faster than AL’s over the last 12 months.

AL's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WD (61). This means that AL’s stock grew similarly to WD’s over the last 12 months.

WD's SMR Rating (81) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as AL (83). This means that WD’s stock grew similarly to AL’s over the last 12 months.

AL's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as WD (82). This means that AL’s stock grew similarly to WD’s over the last 12 months.

AL's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WD (69). This means that AL’s stock grew somewhat faster than WD’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALWD
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WD
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EWY55.600.79
+1.44%
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
IYT59.740.52
+0.87%
iShares Transportation Average ETF
EAOK25.260.11
+0.42%
iShares ESG Aware 30/70 Cnsrv Allc ETF
SIO25.570.08
+0.32%
Touchstone Strategic Income ETF
DXD30.07-0.63
-2.05%
ProShares UltraShort Dow30

WD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WD has been closely correlated with PFSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WD jumps, then PFSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WD
1D Price
Change %
WD100%
+1.21%
PFSI - WD
68%
Closely correlated
-2.76%
LC - WD
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.85%
UHAL - WD
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
AL - WD
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.77%
BBDC - WD
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
More