ALB
Price
$67.96
Change
+$5.29 (+8.44%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
15.48B
28 days until earnings call
FUL
Price
$62.98
Change
+$1.02 (+1.65%)
Updated
Jul 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.35B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALB vs FUL

Header iconALB vs FUL Comparison
Open Charts ALB vs FULBanner chart's image
Albemarle
Price$67.96
Change+$5.29 (+8.44%)
Volume$25.92K
Capitalization15.48B
HB Fuller
Price$62.98
Change+$1.02 (+1.65%)
Volume$4.2K
Capitalization4.35B
ALB vs FUL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALB vs. FUL commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a Buy and FUL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (ALB: $67.99 vs. FUL: $61.96)
Brand notoriety: ALB and FUL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALB: 137% vs. FUL: 234%
Market capitalization -- ALB: $15.48B vs. FUL: $4.35B
ALB [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $15.48B. FUL’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $4.35B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $223.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $9.31B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ALB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUL is a better buy in the long-term than ALB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALB is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +12.60% price change this week, while FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was +8.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALB is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

FUL is expected to report earnings on Sep 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (+3.51% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALB($15.5B) has a higher market cap than FUL($4.35B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than ALB: FUL (28.70) vs ALB (9.67). FUL YTD gains are higher at: -7.443 vs. ALB (-20.053). ALB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 793M vs. FUL (540M). ALB has more cash in the bank: 890M vs. FUL (165M). FUL has less debt than ALB: FUL (1.83B) vs ALB (4.28B). ALB has higher revenues than FUL: ALB (9.62B) vs FUL (3.51B).
ALBFULALB / FUL
Capitalization15.5B4.35B357%
EBITDA793M540M147%
Gain YTD-20.053-7.443269%
P/E Ratio9.6728.7034%
Revenue9.62B3.51B274%
Total Cash890M165M539%
Total Debt4.28B1.83B234%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALB vs FUL: Fundamental Ratings
ALB
FUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
84
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10058
SMR RATING
1..100
9380
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
228
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUL's Valuation (56) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALB (93) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALB (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's SMR Rating (80) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as ALB (93) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as ALB (62) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (28) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBFUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRVLX47.42N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Value
HIAGX23.66N/A
N/A
Hartford Disciplined Equity HLS IA
SBACX29.36N/A
N/A
Touchstone Balanced C
TSLTX4.76N/A
N/A
Transamerica Small Cap Value I3
MSTSX11.65N/A
N/A
Morningstar Global Opportunistic Equity

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with RPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then RPM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+3.01%
RPM - FUL
75%
Closely correlated
+2.32%
PPG - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
+2.34%
SCL - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
+4.80%
MTX - FUL
66%
Loosely correlated
+4.45%
KWR - FUL
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More