ALB
Price
$168.29
Change
-$0.69 (-0.41%)
Updated
Sep 22, 6:59 PM EST
38 days until earnings call
FUL
Price
$66.60
Change
+$0.05 (+0.08%)
Updated
Sep 22, 6:59 PM EST
3 days until earnings call

Compare trend and price ALB vs FUL

Header iconALB vs FUL Comparison
Open Charts ALB vs FULBanner chart's image
Albemarle
Price$168.29
Change-$0.69 (-0.41%)
Volume$369.45K
CapitalizationN/A
HB Fuller
Price$66.60
Change+$0.05 (+0.08%)
Volume$50.59K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ALB vs FUL Comparison Chart

Loading...

Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
VS
ALB vs. FUL commentary
Sep 24, 2023

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a Sell and FUL is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2023
Stock price -- (ALB: $168.21 vs. FUL: $66.61)
Brand notoriety: ALB and FUL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALB: 70% vs. FUL: 71%
Market capitalization -- ALB: $19.74B vs. FUL: $3.59B
ALB [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $19.74B. FUL’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $181.98B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $8.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALB is a better buy in the long-term than FUL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FUL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALB is a better buy in the short-term than FUL.

Price Growth

ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -8.50% price change this week, while FUL (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -2.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALB is expected to report earnings on Nov 01, 2023.

FUL is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-2.87% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for ALB with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for FUL with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALB($19.7B) has a higher market cap than FUL($3.59B). FUL has higher P/E ratio than ALB: FUL (23.53) vs ALB (5.06). FUL YTD gains are higher at: -6.208 vs. ALB (-21.982). ALB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.51B vs. FUL (495M). ALB has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. FUL (103M). FUL has less debt than ALB: FUL (1.88B) vs ALB (3.52B). ALB has higher revenues than FUL: ALB (9.66B) vs FUL (3.61B).
ALBFULALB / FUL
Capitalization19.7B3.59B549%
EBITDA3.51B495M709%
Gain YTD-21.982-6.208354%
P/E Ratio5.0623.5321%
Revenue9.66B3.61B268%
Total Cash1.6B103M1,553%
Total Debt3.52B1.88B187%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALB vs FUL: Fundamental Ratings
ALB
FUL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4654
SMR RATING
1..100
2070
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ALB's Valuation (59) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (59) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as FUL (54) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew similarly to FUL’s over the last 12 months.

ALB's SMR Rating (20) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUL (70) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUL’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as ALB (65) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.

FUL's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALB (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that FUL’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALBFUL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Technical Analysis# Of IndicatorsAvg. Odds
   
   
Show details...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHN10.850.31
+2.94%
China Fund
MZZ15.860.06
+0.38%
ProShares UltraShort MidCap400
SIFI41.870.10
+0.24%
Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF
SCHJ47.030.07
+0.15%
Schwab 1-5 Year Corporate Bond ETF
BUFR24.61-0.04
-0.16%
FT Cboe Vest Fund of Buffer ETFs

FUL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUL has been closely correlated with EMN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUL jumps, then EMN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUL
1D Price
Change %
FUL100%
+0.12%
EMN - FUL
73%
Closely correlated
-1.17%
ESI - FUL
72%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
AVNT - FUL
70%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
PPG - FUL
69%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
RPM - FUL
68%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
More