ALB vs PODD
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALB is a Hold and PODD is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ALB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePODD’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ALB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PODD’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ALB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PODD’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ALB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- PODD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ALB (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +1.41% price change this week, while PODD (@Medical Specialties) price change was -4.84% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.52%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was +2.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
ALB is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.
PODD is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.05% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Medical Specialties (+2.55% weekly)Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.
| ALB | PODD | ALB / PODD | |
| Capitalization | 15.5B | 11.8B | 131% |
| EBITDA | 793M | 324M | 245% |
| Gain YTD | -36.015 | -6.531 | 551% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.67 | 57.17 | 17% |
| Revenue | 9.62B | 1.7B | 567% |
| Total Cash | 890M | 704M | 126% |
| Total Debt | 4.28B | 1.42B | 302% |
ALB | PODD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 69 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PODD's Valuation (88) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ALB (95) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that PODD’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.
PODD's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ALB (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that PODD’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.
PODD's SMR Rating (23) in the Medical Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for ALB (92) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that PODD’s stock grew significantly faster than ALB’s over the last 12 months.
PODD's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Medical Specialties industry is in the same range as ALB (65) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that PODD’s stock grew similarly to ALB’s over the last 12 months.
ALB's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for PODD (74) in the Medical Specialties industry. This means that ALB’s stock grew significantly faster than PODD’s over the last 12 months.
| ALB | PODD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 67% |
PODD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PODD has been loosely correlated with ISRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PODD jumps, then ISRG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PODD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PODD | 100% | +2.28% | ||
| ISRG - PODD | 51% Loosely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| BSX - PODD | 48% Loosely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| SYK - PODD | 46% Loosely correlated | +2.51% | ||
| MMSI - PODD | 45% Loosely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| QDEL - PODD | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
More | ||||