Ad is loading...
ALCAX vs FCCQX
ALCAX vs FCCQX Comparison
Open Charts ALCAX vs FCCQX
AB Municipal Income California A
Price$10.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc A
Price$10.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
ALCAX vs FCCQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALCAX vs. FCCQX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALCAX is a Hold and FCCQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCQX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. ALCAX (1.21B). ALCAX pays higher dividends than FCCQX: ALCAX (3.23) vs FCCQX (3.04). ALCAX was incepted earlier than FCCQX: ALCAX (38 years) vs FCCQX (7 years). FCCQX (0.82) is less costly to investors than ALCAX (0.77). ALCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FCCQX (16.05). ALCAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FCCQX (2%) vs FCCQX (2%). FCCQX has a lower initial minimum investment than ALCAX: FCCQX (1000) vs ALCAX (2500). FCCQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.81 vs. ALCAX (1.47). ALCAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.77 vs. FCCQX (0.05).
| ALCAX | FCCQX | ALCAX / FCCQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.74 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.82 | 94% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.931 | -0.641 | 145% |
| Front Load | 3% | 2% | 133% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 1.32B | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 3.04 | 106% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.47 | 1.81 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.07 | 4.66 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.77 | 0.05 | 19,188% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers