Ad is loading...
ALCAX vs FCCRX
ALCAX vs FCCRX Comparison
Open Charts ALCAX vs FCCRX
AB Municipal Income California A
Price$10.27
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.21B
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc R6
Price$10.79
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.32B
ALCAX vs FCCRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ALCAX vs. FCCRX commentary
May 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALCAX is a Hold and FCCRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCCRX has more cash in the bank: 1.32B vs. ALCAX (1.21B). FCCRX (3.33) and ALCAX (3.23) have matching dividends . ALCAX was incepted earlier than FCCRX: ALCAX (38 years) vs FCCRX (8 years). ALCAX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FCCRX (0.52). ALCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 23.00 vs. FCCRX (16.05). ALCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCCRX: ALCAX (2500) vs FCCRX (1000000). FCCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.10 vs. ALCAX (1.47). ALCAX return over 5 years is better than : 9.77 vs. FCCRX (0.99).
| ALCAX | FCCRX | ALCAX / FCCRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.46 | 163% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.52 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.931 | -0.547 | 170% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.21B | 1.32B | 91% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.23 | 3.33 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.47 | 2.10 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.07 | 5.34 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.77 | 0.99 | 986% |
| Returns for 10 years | 11.98 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...