Ad is loading...
ALCYU
Price
$10.80
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
BOWN
Price
$10.88
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
Ad is loading...

ALCYU vs BOWN

Header iconALCYU vs BOWN Comparison
Open Charts ALCYU vs BOWNBanner chart's image
Alchemy Investments Acquisition
Price$10.80
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Bowen Acquisition
Price$10.88
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$525
CapitalizationN/A
ALCYU vs BOWN Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ALCYU vs. BOWN commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALCYU is a Buy and BOWN is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (ALCYU: $10.80 vs. BOWN: $10.89)
Brand notoriety: ALCYU and BOWN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALCYU: 6% vs. BOWN: 1%
Market capitalization -- ALCYU: $0 vs. BOWN: $95.42M
ALCYU [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $0. BOWN’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $95.42M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $2.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALCYU’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBOWN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALCYU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BOWN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALCYU is a better buy in the long-term than BOWN.

Price Growth

ALCYU (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -10.07% price change this week, while BOWN (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALCYU is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.52% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOWN YTD gains are higher at: 5.475 vs. ALCYU (2.955). BOWN has more cash in the bank: 501K vs. ALCYU (424K).
ALCYUBOWNALCYU / BOWN
CapitalizationN/A95.4M-
EBITDA-435.55KN/A-
Gain YTD2.9555.47554%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash424K501K85%
Total Debt436KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAMPX16.130.37
+2.35%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd P
OLVTX22.850.32
+1.42%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R3
UIVNX12.510.12
+0.97%
MFS Intrinsic Value R2
NSOPX18.190.13
+0.72%
North Star Opportunity A
TAMMX36.730.08
+0.22%
Transamerica Multi-Managed Balanced R6

ALCYU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALCYU has been loosely correlated with ALCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ALCYU jumps, then ALCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALCYU
1D Price
Change %
ALCYU100%
N/A
ALCY - ALCYU
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
OAKU - ALCYU
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PCMC - ALCYU
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
INAQ - ALCYU
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLMIU - ALCYU
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BOWN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BOWN and OAKU have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOWN and OAKU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BOWN
1D Price
Change %
BOWN100%
N/A
OAKU - BOWN
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NPAB - BOWN
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NETD - BOWN
19%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
ESHA - BOWN
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
ALCYU - BOWN
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More