ALLY
Price
$43.58
Change
+$0.66 (+1.54%)
Updated
Jul 27, 01:33 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
13.06B
86 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OMF
Price
$60.73
Change
+$0.99 (+1.66%)
Updated
Jul 27, 01:44 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
6.9B
2 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ALLY vs OMF

ALLY vs OMF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ally Financial (ALLY) vs. OneMain Holdings (OMF) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Ally Financial operates primarily in auto finance and digital banking, while OneMain Holdings focuses on personal loans for nonprime consumers, creating distinct risk and growth profiles within consumer finance.
  • Both companies are preparing to report second-quarter 2026 results in late July, with earnings serving as key near-term catalysts for sentiment and price action.
  • OneMain Holdings offers a notably higher dividend yield compared to Ally Financial, appealing to income-oriented investors amid current market conditions.
  • Relative performance in recent weeks has reflected broader sector pressures on consumer lenders, with both stocks showing sensitivity to interest-rate expectations and credit trends.
  • Ally benefits from diversified revenue streams including banking deposits, whereas OneMain’s model emphasizes higher-yield personal lending with corresponding credit risk exposure.
  • Market positioning highlights trade-offs between Ally’s scale in auto lending and OneMain’s specialized focus on underserved borrowers.

Introduction

Ally Financial (ALLY) and OneMain Holdings (OMF) represent two prominent players in the U.S. consumer finance sector. The comparison is relevant for traders and investors seeking exposure to lending activities that serve retail borrowers, including those focused on auto financing and unsecured personal loans. Market participants monitoring interest-rate environments, credit quality trends, and upcoming earnings may find the relative performance and business-model differences between these stocks particularly instructive. This analysis examines observable factors such as recent price behavior, operational focus, and sector dynamics without offering investment recommendations.

Ally Financial Overview and Recent Performance

Ally Financial provides auto financing, online banking, and related financial services to consumers and dealers. In recent market activity, the stock has responded to macroeconomic signals affecting auto sales and deposit costs. Broader sentiment has been influenced by expectations around consumer spending and vehicle financing demand. Ally is scheduled to release its second-quarter 2026 earnings on July 21, 2026, which could clarify trends in net interest income (NII) and credit metrics. Performance in recent weeks has aligned with sector movements driven by interest-rate outlooks and overall equity-market volatility.

OneMain Holdings Overview and Recent Performance

OneMain Holdings specializes in personal loans targeted at nonprime consumers. The company reported first-quarter 2026 earnings per share (EPS) that exceeded analyst estimates, supporting its operational narrative around receivables growth. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near $60, with a dividend yield exceeding 6 percent based on recent closing levels. OneMain Holdings will report second-quarter 2026 results on July 29, 2026. Recent price behavior reflects sensitivity to credit performance indicators and broader consumer-finance sentiment amid evolving economic conditions.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers using varied strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics tailored to current market conditions. Only the most suitable and robust bots earn placement in the trending section, which showcases ranges of returns, win rates, and drawdown metrics across different styles. All bots differ in their approaches, risk parameters, and ticker selections. Traders interested in exploring automated strategies aligned with market trends can review the curated options on the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Ally Financial and OneMain Holdings differ in core business models: Ally derives significant revenue from auto lending and deposit-funded banking operations, while OneMain concentrates on higher-yield personal loans. Growth drivers reflect these distinctions, with Ally exposed to vehicle-financing volumes and OneMain tied to consumer credit demand among nonprime segments. Recent momentum for both has been shaped by similar macro factors, yet OneMain’s elevated dividend yield provides a distinct income characteristic versus Ally’s profile. Risk factors include credit losses for both, though OneMain’s borrower base carries inherently higher default potential. Sector exposure remains concentrated in financials, with sentiment influenced by rate expectations and economic data releases. Trade-offs center on Ally’s diversification versus OneMain’s specialized lending focus and yield advantage.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, earnings visibility, and relative positioning ahead of quarterly reports, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term momentum to OneMain Holdings. This assessment reflects its dividend characteristics and recent earnings beat, though both stocks face comparable macro sensitivities. The evaluation remains probabilistic and subject to new data from upcoming releases.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ALLY vs. OMF commentary
Jul 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALLY is a StrongBuy and OMF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2026
Stock price -- (ALLY: $42.92 vs. OMF: $59.74)
Brand notoriety: ALLY and OMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALLY: 177% vs. OMF: 91%
Market capitalization -- ALLY: $13.06B vs. OMF: $6.9B
ALLY [@Savings Banks] is valued at $13.06B. OMF’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $6.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $676.53B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $32.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileOMF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ALLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • OMF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OMF is a better buy in the long-term than ALLY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALLY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OMF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • OMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ALLY is a better buy in the short-term than OMF.

Price Growth

ALLY (@Savings Banks) experienced а -5.96% price change this week, while OMF (@Savings Banks) price change was -0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -0.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALLY is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

OMF is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-0.77% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALLY($13.1B) has a higher market cap than OMF($6.9B). ALLY has higher P/E ratio than OMF: ALLY (10.10) vs OMF (8.90). ALLY YTD gains are higher at: -3.906 vs. OMF (-8.181). ALLY has less debt than OMF: ALLY (21.1B) vs OMF (22.4B). ALLY has higher revenues than OMF: ALLY (9.37B) vs OMF (5.05B).
ALLYOMFALLY / OMF
Capitalization13.1B6.9B190%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-3.906-8.18148%
P/E Ratio10.108.90113%
Revenue9.37B5.05B186%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt21.1B22.4B94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALLY vs OMF: Fundamental Ratings
ALLY
OMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7488
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10046
SMR RATING
1..100
810
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9980
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OMF's Valuation (10) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as ALLY (18). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to ALLY’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ALLY (100). This means that OMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ALLY’s over the last 12 months.

ALLY's SMR Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as OMF (10). This means that ALLY’s stock grew similarly to OMF’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as ALLY (56). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to ALLY’s over the last 12 months.

OMF's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as ALLY (99). This means that OMF’s stock grew similarly to ALLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALLYOMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ALLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OMF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CAQUU10.00N/A
N/A
Cambridge Acquisition Corp
EYE19.92-0.07
-0.35%
National Vision Holdings
RAL69.43-0.90
-1.28%
Ralliant Corporation
PRE18.74-0.68
-3.50%
Prenetics Global Limited
OPTT0.15-0.03
-18.35%
Ocean Power Technologies

ALLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALLY has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALLY jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALLY
1D Price
Change %
ALLY100%
-2.39%
SYF - ALLY
74%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
OMF - ALLY
73%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
COF - ALLY
72%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
AXP - ALLY
70%
Closely correlated
-4.30%
BFH - ALLY
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.70%
More

OMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OMF has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OMF jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OMF
1D Price
Change %
OMF100%
+1.63%
SYF - OMF
78%
Closely correlated
+1.57%
ALLY - OMF
74%
Closely correlated
-2.39%
R - OMF
72%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
COF - OMF
70%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
URI - OMF
70%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
More