ALV
Price
$95.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
29 days until earnings call
HYZN
Price
$2.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
50 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

ALV vs HYZN

Header iconALV vs HYZN Comparison
Open Charts ALV vs HYZNBanner chart's image
Autoliv
Price$95.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$385.2K
CapitalizationN/A
Hyzon Motors
Price$2.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$216.77K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ALV vs HYZN Comparison Chart
Loading...
ALV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HYZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
ALV vs. HYZN commentary
Sep 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ALV is a Hold and HYZN is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 20, 2024
Stock price -- (ALV: $95.75 vs. HYZN: $2.51)
Brand notoriety: ALV and HYZN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ALV: 49% vs. HYZN: 65%
Market capitalization -- ALV: $9.81B vs. HYZN: $180.63M
ALV [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.81B. HYZN’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $180.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ALV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHYZN’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ALV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HYZN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ALV is a better buy in the long-term than HYZN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ALV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HYZN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ALV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HYZN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both ALV and HYZN are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

ALV (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +2.61% price change this week, while HYZN (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.40% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

ALV is expected to report earnings on Oct 18, 2024.

HYZN is expected to report earnings on Nov 08, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.69% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ALV($9.81B) has a higher market cap than HYZN($181M). ALV YTD gains are higher at: -11.521 vs. HYZN (-94.391). ALV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.08B vs. HYZN (-176.28M). ALV has more cash in the bank: 498M vs. HYZN (112M). HYZN has less debt than ALV: HYZN (7.55M) vs ALV (2.04B). ALV has higher revenues than HYZN: ALV (10.5B) vs HYZN (295K).
ALVHYZNALV / HYZN
Capitalization9.81B181M5,420%
EBITDA1.08B-176.28M-614%
Gain YTD-11.521-94.39112%
P/E Ratio21.08N/A-
Revenue10.5B295K3,559,322%
Total Cash498M112M445%
Total Debt2.04B7.55M26,953%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ALV: Fundamental Ratings
ALV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
36
SMR RATING
1..100
38
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
90
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ALVHYZN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ALV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
HYZN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XLE87.910.17
+0.19%
The Energy Select Sector SPDR® ETF
XCCC39.450.06
+0.16%
BondBloxx CCC Rated USD HY Corp Bd ETF
BSJP23.150.02
+0.09%
Invesco BulletShares 2025 HY Corp Bd ETF
UWM42.29-0.02
-0.05%
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
SPXV59.82-0.12
-0.21%
ProShares S&P 500® ex-Health Care

ALV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ALV has been closely correlated with DAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ALV jumps, then DAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ALV
1D Price
Change %
ALV100%
-1.33%
DAN - ALV
79%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
LEA - ALV
68%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
MGA - ALV
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
VC - ALV
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
GNTX - ALV
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More

HYZN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HYZN has been loosely correlated with STLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HYZN jumps, then STLA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HYZN
1D Price
Change %
HYZN100%
-6.69%
STLA - HYZN
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
ALV - HYZN
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
AXL - HYZN
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.82%
TSLA - HYZN
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.29%
NIO - HYZN
31%
Poorly correlated
-7.21%
More