Advertisement
AM vs WMB
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) vs. Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both AM and WMB are midstream energy firms focused on natural gas infrastructure, with AM centered in the Appalachian Basin and WMB operating a broader U.S. network.
- AM provides a higher dividend yield at 4.11% versus WMB's 2.75%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- Year-to-date performance is comparable, with AM up approximately 25% and WMB at 26.56%.
- AM recently posted Q1 2026 adjusted EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $288 million, up 5% year-over-year.
- WMB has seen recent analyst upgrades, including Goldman Sachs to Buy with an $82 target.
- Market caps differ significantly: AM at $10.33 billion versus WMB's $92.36 billion.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines AM and WMB, two key players in the oil and gas midstream sector. Both companies provide essential infrastructure for natural gas gathering, processing, and transportation amid rising U.S. LNG exports and domestic energy demand. Investors seeking exposure to stable cash flows from energy pipelines, dividend income, or growth in natural gas markets will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and market positioning. Recent market activity highlights their resilience in a volatile energy landscape, offering insights for portfolio diversification or sector rotation strategies.
AM Overview and Recent Performance
Antero Midstream Corporation (AM) owns and operates midstream assets primarily serving the Appalachian Basin, including natural gas gathering pipelines, compression stations, processing plants, and unique water handling services for drilling operations. In recent weeks, AM shares have traded around $21.75, reflecting year-to-date gains of about 25% within a 52-week range of $16.50 to $23.83. The stock's low beta of 0.72 indicates lower volatility compared to the market. Key influences include robust Q1 2026 results, with adjusted EBITDA rising 5% year-over-year to $288 million and free cash flow of $192 million before dividends, driven by steady volumes from anchor customer Antero Resources. Positive AI trend signals, such as breaking above the lower Bollinger Band, have supported upward momentum and investor sentiment.
WMB Overview and Recent Performance
The Williams Companies, Inc. (WMB) is a major energy infrastructure provider with over 32,000 miles of pipelines across the U.S., focusing on natural gas transmission, gathering, processing, and NGL marketing. Shares recently hovered near $75.53, up 26.56% year-to-date in a 52-week range of $55.82 to $76.87, with a beta of 0.65 signaling defensive qualities. Recent market activity has been bolstered by analyst optimism ahead of Q1 earnings, expected EPS of $0.64, and a dividend hike to $0.525 per share. Upgrades like Goldman Sachs' Buy rating with an $82 target reflect confidence in LNG-driven growth and pipeline expansions. AI analysis shows bullish momentum from positive MACD and crossing above the 50-day moving average, though overbought indicators suggest potential near-term pullbacks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots curated from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies. These bots employ AI/ML agents, trend following, swing trading, and risk-managed exits like 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss corridors, with performance stats including annualized returns from +23.67% to +164.21%, win rates of 51.24% to 88.14%, profit factors up to 11.70, and trade durations from hours to 50 days. Top performers target sectors like semiconductors and ETFs, trading 3 to 18 tickers each, with profit-to-drawdown ratios reaching 16.97. One bot includes AM-related assets, highlighting adaptive strategies suited to current volatility. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your trading approach.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AM and WMB share midstream business models centered on fee-based contracts for natural gas handling, insulating them from commodity price swings. Growth drivers include surging LNG exports and Appalachian/Utica production for both, but WMB benefits from diversified geography and larger scale (market cap $92B vs. $10B). Recent momentum is similar with strong YTD returns, though AM's higher P/E growth rating contrasts WMB's superior revenue scale ($11.8B TTM vs. $1.28B). Risk factors involve regulatory scrutiny on pipelines and debt loads (both ~190% debt/equity), with AM more exposed to single-customer concentration. Market sentiment favors WMB via upgrades, while AM attracts yield seekers.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors WMB over AM due to its expansive pipeline network, recent analyst upgrades signaling stronger catalysts, and consistent trend consistency amid broader market positioning. While both exhibit bullish signals like positive MACD, WMB's scale and lower short interest enhance stability probabilities in the current energy environment.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AM is a StrongBuy and WMB is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWMB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- WMB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WMB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
- WMB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AM (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +0.70% price change this week, while WMB (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +0.91% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.32%.
Reported Earning Dates
AM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
WMB is expected to report earnings on Aug 10, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Oil & Gas Pipelines (+2.49% weekly)Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
| AM | WMB | AM / WMB | |
| Capitalization | 10.3B | 88.2B | 12% |
| EBITDA | 970M | 7.67B | 13% |
| Gain YTD | 24.571 | 21.668 | 113% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.20 | 31.61 | 80% |
| Revenue | 1.29B | 11.9B | 11% |
| Total Cash | 0 | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 3.71B | 30.3B | 12% |
AM | WMB | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 3 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 45 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | 53 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AM's Valuation (18) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WMB (24). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.
AM's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WMB (3). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.
WMB's SMR Rating (43) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as AM (45). This means that WMB’s stock grew similarly to AM’s over the last 12 months.
AM's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WMB (50). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.
AM's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Oil And Gas Pipelines industry is in the same range as WMB (53). This means that AM’s stock grew similarly to WMB’s over the last 12 months.
| AM | WMB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 45% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 68% | 11 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 50% | 7 days ago 45% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
AM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AM has been loosely correlated with DTM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AM jumps, then DTM could also see price increases.
WMB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WMB has been closely correlated with KMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WMB jumps, then KMI could also see price increases.