Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAAX vs NBMAX
AMAAX vs NBMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMAAX vs NBMAX
AB Municipal Income II Massachusetts A
Price$9.94
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets237.78M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.81
Change-$0.02 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets412.52M
AMAAX vs NBMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAAX vs. NBMAX commentary
Jul 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAAX is a Hold and NBMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMAX has more cash in the bank: 413M vs. AMAAX (238M). NBMAX pays higher dividends than AMAAX: NBMAX (3.56) vs AMAAX (2.88). AMAAX was incepted earlier than NBMAX: AMAAX (31 years) vs NBMAX (39 years). AMAAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than NBMAX (0.60). AMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.00 vs. NBMAX (14.00). AMAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMAX: AMAAX (2500) vs NBMAX (100000). NBMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.35 vs. AMAAX (-2.66). NBMAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.35 vs. AMAAX (-4.66).
| AMAAX | NBMAX | AMAAX / NBMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.60 | 128% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.60 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.585 | -3.153 | 82% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 238M | 413M | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.88 | 3.56 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.66 | -2.35 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.65 | 2.23 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.66 | -3.35 | 139% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.59 | 8.03 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers