Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAAX vs NBMAX
AMAAX vs NBMAX Comparison
Open Charts AMAAX vs NBMAX
AB Municipal Income II Massachusetts A
Price$10.02
Change-$0.03 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets228.65M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond I
Price$8.90
Change-$0.03 (-0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets438.51M
AMAAX vs NBMAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAAX vs. NBMAX commentary
Jun 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAAX is a Hold and NBMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NBMAX has more cash in the bank: 439M vs. AMAAX (229M). NBMAX pays higher dividends than AMAAX: NBMAX (3.54) vs AMAAX (2.83). AMAAX was incepted earlier than NBMAX: AMAAX (31 years) vs NBMAX (38 years). AMAAX (0.89) is less costly to investors than NBMAX (0.59). NBMAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. AMAAX (15.00). AMAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than NBMAX: AMAAX (2500) vs NBMAX (100000). NBMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.56 vs. AMAAX (0.07). NBMAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.20 vs. AMAAX (-1.62).
| AMAAX | NBMAX | AMAAX / NBMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.59 | 131% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.59 | 151% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.796 | -2.137 | 84% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 229M | 439M | 52% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.83 | 3.54 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.07 | 0.56 | 12% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.62 | 2.19 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.62 | -0.20 | 793% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.49 | 9.49 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement