Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAAX vs SQMCX
AMAAX vs SQMCX Comparison
Open Charts AMAAX vs SQMCX
AB Municipal Income II Massachusetts A
Price$10.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.93M
DWS Massachusetts Tax Free C
Price$12.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.21M
AMAAX vs SQMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAAX vs. SQMCX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAAX is a Hold and SQMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMAAX has more cash in the bank: 235M vs. SQMCX (195M). AMAAX pays higher dividends than SQMCX: AMAAX (3.12) vs SQMCX (2.01). AMAAX was incepted earlier than SQMCX: AMAAX (31 years) vs SQMCX (24 years). SQMCX (1.71) is less costly to investors than AMAAX (0.89). SQMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 52.00 vs. AMAAX (15.00). SQMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMAAX: SQMCX (1000) vs AMAAX (2500). AMAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.70 vs. SQMCX (-0.99). AMAAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.28 vs. SQMCX (-5.76).
| AMAAX | SQMCX | AMAAX / SQMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.60 | 48% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 1.71 | 52% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.409 | -2.090 | 67% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 235M | 195M | 121% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.12 | 2.01 | 155% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.70 | -0.99 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.84 | 3.10 | 124% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.28 | -5.76 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 0.70 | 5.40 | 13% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement