Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMACX vs NMAAX
AMACX vs NMAAX Comparison
Open Charts AMACX vs NMAAX
AB Municipal Income II Massachusetts C
Price$10.00
Change-$0.02 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets229.58M
Nuveen MA Municipal Bond A
Price$8.90
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets384.33M
AMACX vs NMAAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMACX vs. NMAAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMACX is a Hold and NMAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMAAX has more cash in the bank: 384M vs. AMACX (230M). NMAAX pays higher dividends than AMACX: NMAAX (3.34) vs AMACX (2.35). AMACX was incepted earlier than NMAAX: AMACX (31 years) vs NMAAX (31 years). AMACX (1.64) is less costly to investors than NMAAX (0.79). NMAAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. AMACX (15.00). AMACX (2500) and NMAAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. NMAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.83 vs. AMACX (-1.41). NMAAX return over 5 years is better than : -1.35 vs. AMACX (-4.18).
| AMACX | NMAAX | AMACX / NMAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.52 | 0.79 | 192% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.64 | 0.79 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.821 | -2.331 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 230M | 384M | 60% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.35 | 3.34 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.41 | -0.83 | 170% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.62 | 1.69 | -36% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.18 | -1.35 | 310% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.67 | 7.66 | -35% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement