AMAL
Price
$36.10
Change
+$0.80 (+2.27%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
732.23M
4 days until earnings call
FFBC
Price
$27.95
Change
+$0.40 (+1.45%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
2.08B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMAL vs FFBC

Header iconAMAL vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts AMAL vs FFBCBanner chart's image
Amalgamated Financial
Price$36.10
Change+$0.80 (+2.27%)
Volume$207.68K
Capitalization732.23M
First Financial Ban
Price$27.95
Change+$0.40 (+1.45%)
Volume$1.14M
Capitalization2.08B
AMAL vs FFBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMAL vs. FFBC commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAL is a Hold and FFBC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AMAL: $36.10 vs. FFBC: $27.95)
Brand notoriety: AMAL and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMAL: 125% vs. FFBC: 275%
Market capitalization -- AMAL: $732.23M vs. FFBC: $2.08B
AMAL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $732.23M. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the long-term than AMAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMAL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMAL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBC is a better buy in the short-term than AMAL.

Price Growth

AMAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +11.21% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMAL is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.08B) has a higher market cap than AMAL($732M). FFBC (8.15) and AMAL (8.10) have similar P/E ratio . AMAL YTD gains are higher at: 7.858 vs. FFBC (3.981). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 213M vs. AMAL (5.49M). AMAL has less debt than FFBC: AMAL (336M) vs FFBC (1.28B). FFBC has higher revenues than AMAL: FFBC (840M) vs AMAL (286M).
AMALFFBCAMAL / FFBC
Capitalization732M2.08B35%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.8583.981197%
P/E Ratio8.108.1599%
Revenue286M840M34%
Total Cash5.49M213M3%
Total Debt336M1.28B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMAL vs FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
AMAL
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1518
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2046
SMR RATING
1..100
1512
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4244
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3523
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (81). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (46). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (15). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

AMAL's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFBC (44). This means that AMAL’s stock grew similarly to FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AMAL (35). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to AMAL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMALFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JLPYX21.950.23
+1.06%
JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus R6
NEFFX63.320.57
+0.91%
American Funds New Economy F2
ISBAX14.660.13
+0.89%
VY® Columbia Contrarian Core A
CAAPX40.050.30
+0.75%
Ariel Appreciation Investor
PISLX13.000.05
+0.39%
Columbia Pyrford International Stck Inst

AMAL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMAL has been closely correlated with CTBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMAL jumps, then CTBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMAL
1D Price
Change %
AMAL100%
+2.27%
CTBI - AMAL
82%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
BHLB - AMAL
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
BY - AMAL
81%
Closely correlated
+1.14%
HWC - AMAL
81%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
FFBC - AMAL
81%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
More

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
+1.45%
UBSI - FFBC
93%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
CBU - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.05%
EBC - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
NWBI - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
BUSE - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.18%
More