Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAPX vs MEDBX
AMAPX vs MEDBX Comparison
Open Charts AMAPX vs MEDBX
Amana Participation Investor
Price$9.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets270.28M
MFS Emerging Markets Debt B
Price$12.19
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.29B
AMAPX vs MEDBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAPX vs. MEDBX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAPX is a Hold and MEDBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDBX has more cash in the bank: 7.29B vs. AMAPX (270M). MEDBX pays higher dividends than AMAPX: MEDBX (5.06) vs AMAPX (3.46). AMAPX was incepted earlier than MEDBX: AMAPX (10 years) vs MEDBX (23 years). MEDBX (1.82) is less costly to investors than AMAPX (0.83). MEDBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. AMAPX (17.00). AMAPX has a lower initial minimum investment than MEDBX: AMAPX (100) vs MEDBX (1000). MEDBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.22 vs. AMAPX (4.71). AMAPX return over 5 years is better than : 7.41 vs. MEDBX (5.48).
| AMAPX | MEDBX | AMAPX / MEDBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.81 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.82 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.694 | 3.747 | 72% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 1000 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270M | 7.29B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.46 | 5.06 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.71 | 6.22 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.57 | 29.26 | 29% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.41 | 5.48 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 27.02 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement