Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAPX vs MEDEX
AMAPX vs MEDEX Comparison
Open Charts AMAPX vs MEDEX
Amana Participation Investor
Price$9.77
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets270.14M
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R2
Price$12.19
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.29B
AMAPX vs MEDEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAPX vs. MEDEX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAPX is a Hold and MEDEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDEX has more cash in the bank: 7.29B vs. AMAPX (270M). MEDEX pays higher dividends than AMAPX: MEDEX (5.56) vs AMAPX (3.46). AMAPX was incepted earlier than MEDEX: AMAPX (10 years) vs MEDEX (17 years). MEDEX (1.32) is less costly to investors than AMAPX (0.83). MEDEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. AMAPX (17.00). MEDEX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMAPX: MEDEX (0) vs AMAPX (100). MEDEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.84 vs. AMAPX (4.93). MEDEX return over 5 years is better than : 8.31 vs. AMAPX (7.52).
| AMAPX | MEDEX | AMAPX / MEDEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.31 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.32 | 63% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.799 | 4.007 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270M | 7.29B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.46 | 5.56 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.93 | 6.84 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.68 | 31.23 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.52 | 8.31 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.55 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement