Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMAPX vs MEDFX
AMAPX vs MEDFX Comparison
Open Charts AMAPX vs MEDFX
Amana Participation Investor
Price$9.77
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets270.28M
MFS Emerging Markets Debt R3
Price$12.14
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.29B
AMAPX vs MEDFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMAPX vs. MEDFX commentary
Jul 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMAPX is a Hold and MEDFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEDFX has more cash in the bank: 7.29B vs. AMAPX (270M). MEDFX pays higher dividends than AMAPX: MEDFX (5.81) vs AMAPX (3.46). AMAPX was incepted earlier than MEDFX: AMAPX (10 years) vs MEDFX (17 years). MEDFX (1.07) is less costly to investors than AMAPX (0.83). MEDFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. AMAPX (17.00). MEDFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AMAPX: MEDFX (0) vs AMAPX (100). MEDFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.02 vs. AMAPX (4.71). MEDFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.48 vs. AMAPX (7.41).
| AMAPX | MEDFX | AMAPX / MEDFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.06 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.83 | 1.07 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.694 | 4.142 | 65% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 270M | 7.29B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.46 | 5.81 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.71 | 7.02 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.57 | 32.14 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.41 | 9.48 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 36.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement