AME
Price
$239.55
Change
+$0.47 (+0.20%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
54.92B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IR
Price
$80.51
Change
+$1.18 (+1.49%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
31.24B
74 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AME vs IR

AME vs IR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? AMETEK (AME) vs. Ingersoll Rand (IR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AMETEK (AME) operates in electronic instruments and electromechanical devices, while Ingersoll Rand (IR) focuses on industrial technologies including air and gas compression systems.
  • Both stocks have shown moderate year-to-date performance in recent market activity, with IR posting approximately 5.3% YTD returns compared to broader market benchmarks.
  • Recent earnings for IR highlighted revenue of $2.05 billion in Q2 2026, exceeding estimates, supporting steady momentum in its industrial segment.
  • AMETEK (AME) benefits from exposure to data center power systems and aerospace markets, contributing to its positioning in specialty industrial machinery.
  • Relative performance reflects differences in sector exposure, with both facing similar macroeconomic influences on industrial demand over recent weeks.
  • Market sentiment for each remains tied to earnings consistency and broader capital goods trends rather than isolated catalysts.

Introduction

This comparison examines AMETEK (AME) and Ingersoll Rand (IR), two established players in the industrial sector, to highlight differences in business models, recent performance, and market positioning. Investors and traders seeking exposure to capital goods and technology-driven industrial solutions may find this analysis relevant for portfolio diversification or relative value assessment. The review draws on observable factors such as earnings trends, sector dynamics, and broader market activity from recent weeks to provide a factual basis for understanding how these stocks have responded to current conditions without favoring either.

AMETEK (AME) Overview and Recent Performance

AMETEK (AME) is a global provider of differentiated electronic instruments and electromechanical devices serving markets including aerospace, power, medical, and industrial applications. The company maintains a diversified portfolio across more than 40 businesses. In recent market activity, AMETEK (AME) has traded in line with specialty industrial machinery peers, reflecting steady demand for its precision technologies amid ongoing infrastructure and data center expansions. Performance has been influenced by consistent operational execution and exposure to growth areas such as power systems, with sentiment supported by the company’s track record of disciplined capital deployment during broader economic uncertainty over recent weeks.

Ingersoll Rand (IR) Overview and Recent Performance

Ingersoll Rand (IR) specializes in mission-critical flow creation and industrial technologies, including compressors, pumps, and power tools for manufacturing, energy, and infrastructure sectors. Recent performance has featured Q2 2026 results with revenue reaching $2.05 billion and adjusted earnings per share of $0.86, both surpassing analyst expectations. Over recent weeks, the stock has exhibited moderate gains aligned with capital goods trends, with year-to-date returns around 5.3% amid mixed broader market conditions. Sentiment has been shaped by resilient industrial demand and the company’s ability to deliver above-estimate results, though tempered by general economic variables affecting capital spending.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance metrics, with only those best suited to prevailing market conditions featured in the trending section. Available bots display a range of statistics including win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles that can vary widely depending on the specific algorithm and assets involved. This resource allows users to explore diverse trading approaches tailored to different risk tolerances and market environments. For more details, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AMETEK (AME) and Ingersoll Rand (IR) differ in core focus, with AMETEK (AME) emphasizing precision instruments and measurement technologies while IR centers on flow creation and compression solutions. Growth drivers for AMETEK (AME) include data center infrastructure and aerospace applications, contrasting with IR’s exposure to general manufacturing and energy markets. Recent momentum has been steadier for IR following its Q2 earnings beat, whereas AMETEK (AME) has benefited from longer-term positioning in high-tech industrial niches. Risk factors include shared sensitivity to industrial cycles and supply chain variables, though IR may face greater cyclicality in traditional heavy industry segments. Sector exposure positions both within capital goods, yet AMETEK (AME) carries relatively higher weighting toward technology-enabled solutions. Overall market sentiment reflects balanced institutional interest without pronounced divergence in recent activity.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as earnings consistency and relative stability in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would likely assign a modest probabilistic edge to Ingersoll Rand (IR) in the current environment due to its demonstrated ability to exceed revenue and earnings estimates. AMETEK (AME) remains competitively positioned through its diversified technology exposure. This assessment draws from trend consistency and positioning rather than forecasts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AME vs. IR commentary
Aug 22, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AME is a Hold and IR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 22, 2026
Stock price -- (AME: $239.08 vs. IR: $79.33)
Brand notoriety: AME: Not notable vs. IR: Notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AME: 133% vs. IR: 67%
Market capitalization -- AME: $54.92B vs. IR: $31.24B
AME [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $54.92B. IR’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $31.24B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $254.84B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $16.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AME’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileIR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AME’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • IR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AME is a better buy in the long-term than IR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AME is a better buy in the short-term than IR.

Price Growth

AME (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -6.69% price change this week, while IR (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -5.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -3.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

AME is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

IR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-3.91% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AME($54.9B) has a higher market cap than IR($31.2B). AME has higher P/E ratio than IR: AME (35.02) vs IR (33.27). AME YTD gains are higher at: 16.808 vs. IR (0.212). AME has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.36B vs. IR (2B). AME has less debt than IR: AME (2.18B) vs IR (4.83B). IR (7.94B) and AME (7.6B) have equivalent revenues.
AMEIRAME / IR
Capitalization54.9B31.2B176%
EBITDA2.36B2B118%
Gain YTD16.8080.2127,910%
P/E Ratio35.0233.27105%
Revenue7.6B7.94B96%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt2.18B4.83B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AME vs IR: Fundamental Ratings
AME
IR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7560
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1755
SMR RATING
1..100
5873
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3257
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2991
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IR's Valuation (63) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AME (75) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that IR’s stock grew similarly to AME’s over the last 12 months.

AME's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (55) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that AME’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.

AME's SMR Rating (58) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as IR (73) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that AME’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.

AME's Price Growth Rating (32) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as IR (57) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that AME’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.

AME's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (91) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that AME’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMEIR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VYX7.650.01
+0.13%
NCR Voyix Corp
KVYO18.11-0.09
-0.49%
Klaviyo
CHRS1.32-0.01
-0.75%
Coherus Oncology Inc
WETH1.23-0.02
-1.60%
Wetouch Technology
URI1095.26-21.78
-1.95%
United Rentals

AME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AME has been closely correlated with ROP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AME jumps, then ROP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AME
1D Price
Change %
AME100%
-1.70%
ROP - AME
75%
Closely correlated
+0.77%
DOV - AME
73%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
EMR - AME
68%
Closely correlated
-1.83%
IR - AME
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.23%
NDSN - AME
63%
Loosely correlated
+8.00%
More