AME
Price
$241.71
Change
+$1.70 (+0.71%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
55.4B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
IR
Price
$83.38
Change
-$0.94 (-1.11%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
32.63B
95 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AME vs IR

AME vs IR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? AMETEK (AME) vs. Ingersoll Rand (IR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AME and IR are both premier industrial technology and engineering companies with significant overlap in specialty industrial equipment, making this a relevant peer comparison.
  • AME has demonstrated consistent margin expansion and disciplined M&A (Mergers & Acquisitions) execution, reinforcing its reputation as a compounder in the industrial space.
  • IR has outperformed in recent quarters on revenue growth, driven by exposure to high-demand end markets like life sciences, energy, and industrial efficiency.
  • Both stocks have shown resilience in recent weeks amid broader industrial sector rotation, though IR has attracted more momentum-driven interest from institutional investors.
  • Valuation divergence has widened, with IR commanding a premium multiple relative to AME, reflecting differing market sentiment around near-term growth trajectories.
  • Tickeron's AI trading bots factor in trend strength, volatility, and relative momentum when ranking these tickers — offering data-driven market perspective.

Introduction

Comparing AME (AMETEK, Inc.) and IR (Ingersoll Rand Inc.) offers a compelling lens into two of the industrial sector's most well-regarded compounders. Both companies operate in adjacent segments of precision instruments, fluid management, and industrial automation, yet their growth strategies, valuation profiles, and recent market momentum have diverged in meaningful ways. For investors seeking exposure to industrial technology with strong M&A track records, understanding how these two names compare across performance, positioning, and risk is essential. This article examines their recent stock behavior, underlying fundamentals, and how AI-driven analytics assess their relative attractiveness in the current market environment.

AME Overview and Recent Performance

AME, known formally as AMETEK, Inc., is a global manufacturer of electronic instruments and electromechanical devices. The company operates through two segments: Electronic Instruments Group (EIG) and Electromechanical Group (EMG). AMETEK's business model is built around acquiring niche industrial technology businesses and improving their operational performance — a playbook that has delivered decades of compounding returns. In recent weeks, AME has traded in a relatively stable range, reflecting its defensive characteristics within the industrial sector. The company recently reported solid quarterly results that highlighted continued margin expansion, though organic revenue growth has been more measured compared to some peers. Analyst sentiment remains broadly constructive, with particular attention on AMETEK's ability to deploy its strong balance sheet for accretive acquisitions in aerospace, medical, and automation end markets.

IR Overview and Recent Performance

IR — Ingersoll Rand Inc. — emerged from its merger with Gardner Denver in 2020 as a diversified industrial company focused on mission-critical flow creation and industrial technologies. The company serves a wide array of end markets, including life sciences, energy, water, and specialty manufacturing. In recent weeks, IR has garnered notable investor attention, supported by robust demand in its compressor and vacuum pump product lines and increasing exposure to sustainability-linked industrial applications. Recent quarterly results exceeded consensus expectations, driven by strong order growth and pricing power. The stock has reflected this positive sentiment with relatively strong price action. Market participants have also noted IR's aggressive but disciplined M&A strategy, which continues to expand its total addressable market and aftermarket recurring revenue base — both critical factors underpinning its relative valuation premium.

Trending AI Robots

For traders and investors seeking a data-driven edge, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of the platform's most effective AI trading bots. With hundreds of AI trading bots available — each trading thousands of different tickers using distinct strategies — Tickeron highlights only those that align best with current market conditions. These bots employ various trading styles, ranging from short-term swing trading to longer-duration trend following, and are backed by verifiable performance statistics including win rates and trade frequency. The curated section showcases bots with strong recent track records, giving users a practical starting point for evaluating automated trading strategies tailored to tickers like AME and IR. Explore the Trending AI Robots to discover which bots are currently positioned for today's market dynamics.

Head-to-Head Comparison

From a business model perspective, both AME and IR are serial acquirers with diversified industrial portfolios, yet their approaches differ. AMETEK has historically favored smaller, high-margin niche acquisitions and emphasized operational efficiency, resulting in consistently high incremental margins. Ingersoll Rand, by contrast, has pursued larger-scale M&A transactions and brand consolidation, prioritizing revenue growth and end-market expansion alongside margin improvement.

On growth drivers, IR currently benefits from stronger tailwinds in life sciences, semiconductor, and energy efficiency applications — sectors experiencing elevated capital investment cycles. AME derives meaningful exposure from aerospace and defense, where demand has been stable but growth rates are more measured. Recent momentum has favored IR, with the stock showing stronger relative strength and higher trading volumes, though this also means IR trades at a more demanding price-to-earnings multiple.

Risk profiles diverge as well. AME's broader diversification across thousands of smaller product lines provides a cushion against sector-specific downturns. IR's larger-scale end-market concentration — while beneficial during upcycles — introduces somewhat higher sensitivity to macro slowdowns in key verticals. Sentiment data from recent market activity suggests institutional flows have tilted toward IR for growth exposure, while AME remains favored by quality-focused portfolios seeking steadier compounding.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and catalyst positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely lean toward IR in the current environment. Ingersoll Rand's combination of stronger recent price momentum, positive earnings revisions, and exposure to high-growth industrial niches provides a pattern that AI models trained on trend-following parameters tend to identify as favorable. That said, AME displays superior stability metrics and lower volatility characteristics, which may appeal to AI strategies optimized for risk-adjusted consistency over raw momentum. The AI verdict is not a definitive call but a probabilistic assessment — reflecting that IR currently exhibits stronger tactical positioning, while AME retains strategic appeal for longer-horizon, quality-oriented frameworks. This assessment is generated algorithmically and reflects pattern recognition, not fundamental conviction.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AME vs. IR commentary
Aug 01, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AME is a StrongBuy and IR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 01, 2026
Stock price -- (AME: $241.71 vs. IR: $83.38)
Brand notoriety: AME: Not notable vs. IR: Notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AME: 91% vs. IR: 150%
Market capitalization -- AME: $55.4B vs. IR: $32.63B
AME [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $55.4B. IR’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $32.63B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $263.75B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $16.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AME’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AME’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AME is a better buy in the long-term than IR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AME’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AME’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • IR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AME and IR are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AME (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -0.11% price change this week, while IR (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -1.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -11.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

AME is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

IR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-1.07% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AME($55.4B) has a higher market cap than IR($32.6B). AME has higher P/E ratio than IR: AME (36.51) vs IR (34.45). AME YTD gains are higher at: 18.093 vs. IR (5.304). AME has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.36B vs. IR (1.69B). AME has less debt than IR: AME (2.18B) vs IR (4.84B). IR (7.78B) and AME (7.6B) have equivalent revenues.
AMEIRAME / IR
Capitalization55.4B32.6B170%
EBITDA2.36B1.69B140%
Gain YTD18.0935.304341%
P/E Ratio36.5134.45106%
Revenue7.6B7.78B98%
Total CashN/A1.27B-
Total Debt2.18B4.84B45%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AME vs IR: Fundamental Ratings
AME
IR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
65
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1651
SMR RATING
1..100
5984
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2972
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IR's Valuation (65) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AME (74) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that IR’s stock grew similarly to AME’s over the last 12 months.

AME's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (51) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that AME’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.

AME's SMR Rating (59) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as IR (84) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that AME’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.

AME's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as IR (50) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that AME’s stock grew similarly to IR’s over the last 12 months.

AME's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IR (72) in the Industrial Conglomerates industry. This means that AME’s stock grew somewhat faster than IR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMEIR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
IR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HTLM1.950.04
+2.09%
HomesToLife Ltd
PJT168.310.76
+0.45%
PJT Partners
UAL123.56N/A
N/A
United Airlines Holdings
EVER25.05N/A
N/A
EverQuote
GP1.48-0.01
-0.67%
GreenPower Motor Company Inc.

AME and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AME has been closely correlated with ROP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AME jumps, then ROP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AME
1D Price
Change %
AME100%
+0.71%
ROP - AME
75%
Closely correlated
+0.70%
DOV - AME
73%
Closely correlated
+0.27%
EMR - AME
68%
Closely correlated
+0.79%
IR - AME
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.11%
RRX - AME
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
More