AMEGF
Price
$0.53
Change
-$0.01 (-1.89%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
GBRCF
Price
$0.33
Change
-$0.01 (-2.94%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

AMEGF vs GBRCF

Header iconAMEGF vs GBRCF Comparison
Open Charts AMEGF vs GBRCFBanner chart's image
AMERICAN EAGLE GOLD
Price$0.53
Change-$0.01 (-1.89%)
Volume$7.3K
CapitalizationN/A
Gold Bull Resources
Price$0.33
Change-$0.01 (-2.94%)
Volume$15.01K
CapitalizationN/A
AMEGF vs GBRCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMEGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMEGF vs. GBRCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMEGF is a Sell and GBRCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AMEGF: $0.52 vs. GBRCF: $0.33)
Brand notoriety: AMEGF and GBRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMEGF: 17% vs. GBRCF: 278%
Market capitalization -- AMEGF: $19.17M vs. GBRCF: $4.08M
AMEGF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $19.17M. GBRCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $4.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMEGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGBRCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMEGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GBRCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBRCF is a better buy in the long-term than AMEGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMEGF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBRCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMEGF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GBRCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GBRCF is a better buy in the short-term than AMEGF.

Price Growth

AMEGF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.13% price change this week, while GBRCF (@Precious Metals) price change was +0.92% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.07%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

GBRCF is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-3.69% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMEGF($19.2M) has a higher market cap than GBRCF($4.08M). AMEGF YTD gains are higher at: 157.479 vs. GBRCF (18.815). GBRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.34M vs. AMEGF (-2.82M). AMEGF has more cash in the bank: 1.51M vs. GBRCF (1.27M). GBRCF has less debt than AMEGF: GBRCF (42.2K) vs AMEGF (57.1K). AMEGF (0) and GBRCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
AMEGFGBRCFAMEGF / GBRCF
Capitalization19.2M4.08M470%
EBITDA-2.82M-2.34M121%
Gain YTD157.47918.815837%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.51M1.27M119%
Total Debt57.1K42.2K135%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GBRCF: Fundamental Ratings
GBRCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
87
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
90
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMEGFGBRCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMEGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBRCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VFQY146.53-1.00
-0.68%
Vanguard US Quality Factor ETF
BIS16.96-0.14
-0.82%
ProShares UltraShort Nasdaq Biotech
KOMP53.78-0.47
-0.87%
SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Comps ETF
AESR17.80-0.17
-0.95%
Anfield US Equity Sector Rotation ETF
PXJ27.64-0.27
-0.98%
Invesco Oil & Gas Services ETF

AMEGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMEGF and RNDXF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMEGF and RNDXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMEGF
1D Price
Change %
AMEGF100%
-0.55%
RNDXF - AMEGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUHIF - AMEGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ERYTF - AMEGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBRCF - AMEGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OSIIF - AMEGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GBRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBRCF and GAYMF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBRCF and GAYMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBRCF
1D Price
Change %
GBRCF100%
N/A
GAYMF - GBRCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.22%
DNGDF - GBRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
AMEGF - GBRCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
BONXF - GBRCF
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
BRGC - GBRCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.74%
More