AMH
Price
$34.33
Change
+$0.66 (+1.96%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
12.35B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
AVB
Price
$184.06
Change
+$0.15 (+0.08%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
26.28B
69 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMH vs AVB

AMH vs AVB Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMH vs. AVB commentary
Aug 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMH is a Hold and AVB is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 20, 2026
Stock price -- (AMH: $34.33 vs. AVB: $184.06)
Brand notoriety: AMH and AVB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMH: 89% vs. AVB: 222%
Market capitalization -- AMH: $12.35B vs. AVB: $26.28B
AMH [@Media Conglomerates] is valued at $12.35B. AVB’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $26.28B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $26.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $9.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAVB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AMH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • AVB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AVB is a better buy in the long-term than AMH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AVB’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • AVB’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AMH is a better buy in the short-term than AVB.

Price Growth

AMH (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +1.48% price change this week, while AVB (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +2.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.80%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMH is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

AVB is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Media Conglomerates (+1.20% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AVB($26.3B) has a higher market cap than AMH($12.4B). AMH has higher P/E ratio than AVB: AMH (27.25) vs AVB (25.28). AMH YTD gains are higher at: 9.278 vs. AVB (3.605). AVB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.24B vs. AMH (1.23B). AMH has less debt than AVB: AMH (5.15B) vs AVB (9.19B). AVB has higher revenues than AMH: AVB (3.08B) vs AMH (1.86B).
AMHAVBAMH / AVB
Capitalization12.4B26.3B47%
EBITDA1.23B2.24B55%
Gain YTD9.2783.605257%
P/E Ratio27.2525.28108%
Revenue1.86B3.08B60%
Total CashN/A80.7M-
Total Debt5.15B9.19B56%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMH vs AVB: Fundamental Ratings
AMH
AVB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6326
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8174
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6537
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMH's Valuation (30) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AVB (33). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to AVB’s over the last 12 months.

AMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AVB (100). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to AVB’s over the last 12 months.

AVB's SMR Rating (74) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (81). This means that AVB’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.

AMH's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AVB (58). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to AVB’s over the last 12 months.

AVB's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (65). This means that AVB’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMHAVB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
43%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
AVB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SKE34.133.05
+9.81%
Skeena Resources Limited
PLBY1.220.04
+3.39%
Playboy Inc
LVS46.581.11
+2.44%
Las Vegas Sands Corp
SB8.170.14
+1.74%
Safe Bulkers
TKLF1.74-0.10
-5.43%
Tokyo Lifestyle Co Ltd

AMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMH has been closely correlated with INVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMH jumps, then INVH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMH
1D Price
Change %
AMH100%
+1.96%
INVH - AMH
86%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
UDR - AMH
76%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
CPT - AMH
75%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
MAA - AMH
74%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
EQR - AMH
74%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

AVB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVB has been closely correlated with MAA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AVB jumps, then MAA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AVB
1D Price
Change %
AVB100%
N/A
MAA - AVB
82%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
REG - AVB
77%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
FRT - AVB
74%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
PECO - AVB
72%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
AMH - AVB
71%
Closely correlated
+1.96%
More