Advertisement
AMH vs UDR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) vs. UDR, Inc. (UDR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) has delivered stronger year-to-date returns of approximately 3.7% compared to UDR's 2.7%.
- Both are residential real estate investment trusts (REITs), but AMH focuses on single-family rentals while UDR specializes in multifamily apartments.
- UDR offers a higher dividend yield around 5%, appealing to income-focused investors, versus AMH's 4%.
- AMH trades at a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of about 26 versus UDR's 31, suggesting relative value.
- Recent market activity shows both stocks navigating interest rate pressures, with UDR preparing for Q1 earnings amid positive occupancy trends.
- UDR exhibits slightly lower volatility with a beta of 0.72 compared to AMH's 0.81.
Introduction
American Homes 4 Rent (AMH) and UDR, Inc. (UDR) represent key players in the residential REIT sector, offering exposure to rental housing demand amid ongoing affordability challenges. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning to aid investors and traders evaluating opportunities in single-family versus multifamily rentals. With persistent housing shortages driving occupancy and rents, both stocks provide insights into sector dynamics, helping portfolio managers balance growth, income, and risk in the current environment.
AMH Overview and Recent Performance
American Homes 4 Rent (AMH), a leading single-family rental REIT, owns and manages thousands of homes across high-growth U.S. markets. Its business emphasizes resident experience, technology-driven operations, and build-to-rent development. In recent weeks, AMH stock has traded around $30.50, reflecting resilience near the middle of its 52-week range of $27 to $39. Year-to-date gains of about 3.7% have outpaced peers, supported by steady funds from operations (FFO) matching expectations in its latest quarterly results. Sentiment benefits from strong same-home rent growth and high occupancy, though elevated interest rates have tempered expansion. Trading volume remains consistent, signaling stable investor interest amid broader REIT volatility.
UDR Overview and Recent Performance
UDR, Inc. (UDR) is a prominent multifamily REIT with a portfolio concentrated in coastal and sunbelt markets, focusing on upscale apartments. It prioritizes operational efficiency, redevelopment, and development projects. Recently, UDR shares have hovered near $35, within a 52-week band of $33 to $44. Year-to-date performance stands at roughly 2.7%, trailing AMH slightly, influenced by analyst updates and dividend declarations. Positive occupancy above 96% and easing supply pressures have bolstered sentiment ahead of Q1 earnings, though share price dips reflect sector-wide rate sensitivity. Recent trading shows mixed signals but steady volume.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds (over 350 total), designed for copy trading across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for prevailing market conditions earn a spot among the 25 highlighted bots, which employ diverse strategies like short-term scalping (5-60 minutes), trend following, and sector rotation. Performance stats impress: annualized returns range from 15% to over 127%, win rates 55-70%, profit factors 1.5-7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios up to 8.4, with drawdowns typically under $50,000 on simulated portfolios. These bots target niches such as semiconductors, energy, small-caps, and leveraged plays, offering real-time signals via virtual or brokerage agents. Traders can explore these high-conviction tools to align with current trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
AMH and UDR both capitalize on U.S. housing shortages but differ in property types: single-family homes for AMH versus apartments for UDR, affecting tenant demographics and rent growth profiles. Growth drivers include AMH's build-to-rent focus and UDR's redevelopment pipeline. Recent momentum favors AMH on YTD returns, while UDR edges on dividend yield. Risk factors are similar—interest rate exposure—but UDR's lower beta implies less volatility. Sector exposure is residential, with UDR more urban-oriented. Market sentiment tilts toward AMH for value, UDR for income stability, highlighting trade-offs in a yield-hungry environment.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models would likely favor AMH in the current environment, owing to its superior year-to-date momentum, higher EPS, and more favorable P/E ratio amid consistent single-family demand trends. While UDR offers dividend appeal and earnings catalysts, AMH's relative stability and valuation position it probabilistically stronger for near-term outperformance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMH is a Buy and UDR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUDR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- UDR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMH’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UDR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMH’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- UDR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMH (@Media Conglomerates) experienced а +0.25% price change this week, while UDR (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +1.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.61%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
UDR is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Media Conglomerates (-0.14% weekly)Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.
| AMH | UDR | AMH / UDR | |
| Capitalization | 11.5B | 12B | 96% |
| EBITDA | 1.23B | 1.4B | 88% |
| Gain YTD | 0.946 | 3.093 | 31% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.04 | 25.11 | 104% |
| Revenue | 1.86B | 1.72B | 109% |
| Total Cash | 63.3M | 1.3M | 4,869% |
| Total Debt | 5.15B | 5.85B | 88% |
AMH | UDR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 97 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
UDR's Valuation (79) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (82). This means that UDR’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UDR (97). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to UDR’s over the last 12 months.
UDR's SMR Rating (56) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (81). This means that UDR’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
UDR's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as AMH (52). This means that UDR’s stock grew similarly to AMH’s over the last 12 months.
AMH's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as UDR (99). This means that AMH’s stock grew similarly to UDR’s over the last 12 months.
| AMH | UDR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 62% | 4 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 59% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 48% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 47% | 4 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 48% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 49% | 6 days ago 50% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 42% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 46% | 4 days ago 47% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QGRD | 29.48 | 0.56 | +1.93% |
| Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF | |||
| INFO | 26.61 | 0.21 | +0.81% |
| Harbor PanAgora Dynamic Lg Cp Cor ETF | |||
| NRES | 34.29 | 0.26 | +0.76% |
| Xtrackers RREEF Global Natrl Res ETF | |||
| FMAG | 36.02 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| Fidelity Magellan ETF | |||
| RAVI | 75.28 | 0.03 | +0.04% |
| FlexShares Ultra-Short Income ETF | |||
AMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMH has been closely correlated with INVH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMH jumps, then INVH could also see price increases.
UDR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UDR has been closely correlated with CPT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UDR jumps, then CPT could also see price increases.