It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMLI’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKEWL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMLI’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AMLI (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +1.45% price change this week, while KEWL (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +1.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.
AMLI is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
AMLI | KEWL | AMLI / KEWL | |
Capitalization | 149M | N/A | - |
EBITDA | -42.94M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -34.282 | 47.916 | -72% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 17.1M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 171K | N/A | - |
AMLI | KEWL | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 39 Fair valued | 72 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 4 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMLI's Valuation (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KEWL (72). This means that AMLI’s stock grew somewhat faster than KEWL’s over the last 12 months.
KEWL's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMLI (83). This means that KEWL’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMLI’s over the last 12 months.
KEWL's SMR Rating (4) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMLI (91). This means that KEWL’s stock grew significantly faster than AMLI’s over the last 12 months.
KEWL's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as AMLI (46). This means that KEWL’s stock grew similarly to AMLI’s over the last 12 months.
KEWL's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as AMLI (100). This means that KEWL’s stock grew similarly to AMLI’s over the last 12 months.
AMLI | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMLI has been loosely correlated with SLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AMLI jumps, then SLI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMLI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMLI | 100% | -0.56% | ||
SLI - AMLI | 42% Loosely correlated | -11.24% | ||
BHP - AMLI | 38% Loosely correlated | -0.40% | ||
FOSYF - AMLI | 36% Loosely correlated | +2.13% | ||
RIO - AMLI | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.91% | ||
SCCO - AMLI | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.03% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that KEWL and LMRXF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KEWL and LMRXF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To KEWL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KEWL | 100% | +0.03% | ||
LMRXF - KEWL | 5% Poorly correlated | +3.82% | ||
KGHPF - KEWL | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
KCCFF - KEWL | 3% Poorly correlated | -6.60% | ||
AMLI - KEWL | -3% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
LEMIF - KEWL | -4% Poorly correlated | +0.47% | ||
More |