AMLTF vs BFACF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMLTF is a Hold and BFACF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMLTF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBFACF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AMLTF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- BFACF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
AMLTF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BFACF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -2.93% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +1.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.63%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Conglomerates (+1.40% weekly)Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| AMLTF | BFACF | AMLTF / BFACF | |
| Capitalization | 2.25B | 152M | 1,477% |
| EBITDA | 1.41B | -3.43M | -41,221% |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | -1.487 | - |
| P/E Ratio | 228.42 | 45.83 | 498% |
| Revenue | 1.39B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 112K | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
AMLTF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 14 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JEMOX | 32.42 | -0.23 | -0.70% |
| JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity R5 | |||
| VSQFX | 17.02 | -0.30 | -1.73% |
| Invesco MSCI World SRI Index R5 | |||
| PMVEX | 24.87 | -0.49 | -1.93% |
| PGIM Quant Solutions Mid-Cap Val R2 | |||
| FALAX | 49.16 | -1.06 | -2.11% |
| Fidelity Advisor Large Cap A | |||
| HFCGX | 31.16 | -1.17 | -3.62% |
| Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Investor | |||
AMLTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMLTF and BFACF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMLTF and BFACF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMLTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMLTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BFACF - AMLTF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AASP - AMLTF | 2% Poorly correlated | +42.29% | ||
| BQST - AMLTF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ACBD - AMLTF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ABVN - AMLTF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
BFACF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BFACF and GDST have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFACF and GDST's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BFACF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFACF | 100% | N/A | ||
| GDST - BFACF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GLST - BFACF | 27% Poorly correlated | -19.63% | ||
| ZAPP - BFACF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
| DECA - BFACF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AMLTF - BFACF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||