AMLTF
Price
$0.94
Change
+$0.07 (+8.05%)
Updated
Oct 29 closing price
Capitalization
1.89B
BQST
Price
$1.04
Change
+$0.02 (+1.96%)
Updated
Apr 1 closing price
Capitalization
22.28M
Ad is loading...

AMLTF vs BQST

Header iconAMLTF vs BQST Comparison
Open Charts AMLTF vs BQSTBanner chart's image
AMP
Price$0.94
Change+$0.07 (+8.05%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.89B
BioQuest
Price$1.04
Change+$0.02 (+1.96%)
Volume$14.93K
Capitalization22.28M
AMLTF vs BQST Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMLTF vs. BQST commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMLTF is a Hold and BQST is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (AMLTF: $0.94 vs. BQST: $1.04)
Brand notoriety: AMLTF and BQST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMLTF: 100% vs. BQST: 1049%
Market capitalization -- AMLTF: $1.89B vs. BQST: $22.28M
AMLTF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $1.89B. BQST’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $22.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMLTF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBQST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMLTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BQST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMLTF is a better buy in the long-term than BQST.

Price Growth

AMLTF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BQST (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +18.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.79% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMLTF($1.89B) has a higher market cap than BQST($22.3M). BQST YTD gains are higher at: 4.000 vs. AMLTF (0.000). AMLTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.92B vs. BQST (-450.28K). AMLTF has more cash in the bank: 7.18B vs. BQST (15K). BQST has less debt than AMLTF: BQST (183K) vs AMLTF (28.7B). AMLTF has higher revenues than BQST: AMLTF (856M) vs BQST (0).
AMLTFBQSTAMLTF / BQST
Capitalization1.89B22.3M8,462%
EBITDA1.92B-450.28K-425,733%
Gain YTD0.0004.000-
P/E Ratio57.51N/A-
Revenue856M0-
Total Cash7.18B15K47,860,000%
Total Debt28.7B183K15,683,060%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMLTF vs BQST: Fundamental Ratings
AMLTF
BQST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3897
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
2099
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4534
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMLTF's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as BQST (40). This means that AMLTF’s stock grew similarly to BQST’s over the last 12 months.

AMLTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BQST (100). This means that AMLTF’s stock grew similarly to BQST’s over the last 12 months.

AMLTF's SMR Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BQST (99). This means that AMLTF’s stock grew significantly faster than BQST’s over the last 12 months.

BQST's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AMLTF (45). This means that BQST’s stock grew similarly to AMLTF’s over the last 12 months.

AMLTF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as BQST (100). This means that AMLTF’s stock grew similarly to BQST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AEYRX31.36N/A
N/A
American Century Equity Growth R
VADDX72.41N/A
N/A
Invesco Equally-Wtd S&P 500 Y
EAPDX15.91N/A
N/A
Parametric Dividend Income A
KTRZX8.72N/A
N/A
DWS Global Income Builder R6
FIFNX21.81N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Founders

AMLTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMLTF and BFACF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMLTF and BFACF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMLTF
1D Price
Change %
AMLTF100%
N/A
BFACF - AMLTF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.10%
AASP - AMLTF
2%
Poorly correlated
+6.25%
BQST - AMLTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACBD - AMLTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABVN - AMLTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BQST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BQST has been loosely correlated with GATE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BQST jumps, then GATE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BQST
1D Price
Change %
BQST100%
N/A
GATE - BQST
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GATEU - BQST
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELLH - BQST
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOREF - BQST
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DHCC - BQST
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More