AMLTF
Price
$0.82
Change
-$0.01 (-1.20%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.12B
GRAF
Price
$10.38
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 23, 12:27 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
305.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AMLTF vs GRAF

Header iconAMLTF vs GRAF Comparison
Open Charts AMLTF vs GRAFBanner chart's image
AMP
Price$0.82
Change-$0.01 (-1.20%)
Volume$580
Capitalization2.12B
Graf Global
Price$10.38
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$400
Capitalization305.34M
AMLTF vs GRAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMLTF vs. GRAF commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMLTF is a Hold and GRAF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (AMLTF: $0.82 vs. GRAF: $10.38)
Brand notoriety: AMLTF and GRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMLTF: 33% vs. GRAF: 190%
Market capitalization -- AMLTF: $2.12B vs. GRAF: $305.34M
AMLTF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $2.12B. GRAF’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $305.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMLTF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGRAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AMLTF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMLTF is a better buy in the long-term than GRAF.

Price Growth

AMLTF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -1.58% price change this week, while GRAF (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was +0.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

GRAF is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.97% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AMLTF($2.12B) has a higher market cap than GRAF($305M). GRAF has higher P/E ratio than AMLTF: GRAF (115.54) vs AMLTF (18.89). GRAF YTD gains are higher at: 2.874 vs. AMLTF (-13.195). AMLTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.92B vs. GRAF (-1.18M). AMLTF has more cash in the bank: 7.18B vs. GRAF (383K). GRAF has less debt than AMLTF: GRAF (0) vs AMLTF (28.7B). AMLTF has higher revenues than GRAF: AMLTF (856M) vs GRAF (0).
AMLTFGRAFAMLTF / GRAF
Capitalization2.12B305M696%
EBITDA1.92B-1.18M-162,789%
Gain YTD-13.1952.874-459%
P/E Ratio18.89115.5416%
Revenue856M0-
Total Cash7.18B383K1,874,413%
Total Debt28.7B0-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMLTF: Fundamental Ratings
AMLTF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
93
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
89
SMR RATING
1..100
10
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSFFX11.45N/A
N/A
Natixis Target Retirement 2030 N
ADGCX15.16N/A
N/A
AB Core Opportunities C
FSSKX77.53N/A
N/A
Fidelity Stock Selec-Class K
SCVIX34.04N/A
N/A
Allspring Small Company Value Admin
BRGKX37.28N/A
N/A
iShares Russell 1000 Large-Cap Idx K

AMLTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMLTF and AASP have been poorly correlated (+2% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMLTF and AASP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMLTF
1D Price
Change %
AMLTF100%
N/A
AASP - AMLTF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
BQST - AMLTF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ACBD - AMLTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ABVN - AMLTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GRAF - AMLTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
More

GRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GRAF and EMCGU have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GRAF and EMCGU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GRAF
1D Price
Change %
GRAF100%
+0.05%
EMCGU - GRAF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRHC - GRAF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VOYA - GRAF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GIGGU - GRAF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBHGF - GRAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
More