The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
AMOM | |
Gain YTD | -0.256 |
Net Assets | 29.4M |
Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 |
Turnover | 354.00 |
Yield | 0.05 |
Fund Existence | 6 years |
AMOM | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% |
MACD ODDS (%) | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago78% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMOM and ADSK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMOM and ADSK's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM | 100% | -0.40% | ||
ADSK - AMOM | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
HUBB - AMOM | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
MDB - AMOM | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
CCO - AMOM | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
HUBS - AMOM | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.50% | ||
More |