Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AMOM vs IWF
AMOM vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts AMOM vs IWF
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap Mmntm ETF
Price$45.35
Change+$0.37 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.17M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$428.08
Change+$4.56 (+1.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.55B
AMOM vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AMOM vs. IWF commentary
Jul 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMOM is a Buy and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 111B vs. AMOM (29.2M). IWF has a higher annual dividend yield than AMOM: IWF (5.679) vs AMOM (-0.389). AMOM was incepted earlier than IWF: AMOM (6 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than AMOM (0.75). AMOM has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| AMOM | IWF | AMOM / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | -0.389 | 5.679 | -7% |
| Net Assets | 29.2M | 111B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.19 | 395% |
| Turnover | 449.00 | 12.00 | 3,742% |
| Yield | 0.05 | 0.42 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AMOM | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 14 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AMOM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AMOM has been closely correlated with GEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AMOM jumps, then GEV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMOM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMOM | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| GEV - AMOM | 77% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| TT - AMOM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| VST - AMOM | 73% Closely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| GS - AMOM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| MS - AMOM | 69% Closely correlated | +1.42% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.81% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | -0.20% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.24% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
More | ||||