Advertisement
AMR vs AREC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMR is a Hold and AREC is a Hold.
AMR | AREC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 7 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 6 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 82 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMR's Valuation (91) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as AREC (98) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AMR’s stock grew similarly to AREC’s over the last 12 months.
AMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as AREC (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AMR’s stock grew similarly to AREC’s over the last 12 months.
AREC's SMR Rating (6) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is significantly better than the same rating for AMR (92) in the Oil And Gas Production industry. This means that AREC’s stock grew significantly faster than AMR’s over the last 12 months.
AMR's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is in the same range as AREC (82) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AMR’s stock grew similarly to AREC’s over the last 12 months.
AMR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Oil And Gas Production industry is significantly better than the same rating for AREC (100) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AMR’s stock grew significantly faster than AREC’s over the last 12 months.
| AMR | AREC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while AREC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- AREC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AREC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- AREC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AMR (@Coal) experienced а -1.00% price change this week, while AREC (@Environmental Services) price change was -4.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -2.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -26.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.96%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.08%.
Reported Earning Dates
AMR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
AREC is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Coal (-2.46% weekly)Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.
@Environmental Services (-0.69% weekly)Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ISMD | 46.61 | 0.26 | +0.56% |
| Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF (ISMD) | |||
| TSLZ | 12.28 | 0.05 | +0.41% |
| T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) | |||
| ASHR | 32.75 | 0.08 | +0.24% |
| Xtrackers Harvest CSI 300 China A-Shares ETF (ASHR) | |||
| PCCE | 12.55 | N/A | N/A |
| Polen Capital China Growth ETF | |||
| FFND | 31.98 | -0.09 | -0.28% |
| One Global ETF (FFND) | |||
AMR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMR and HCC have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMR and HCC's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMR | 100% | +1.23% | ||
| HCC - AMR | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.15% | ||
| METC - AMR | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| SXC - AMR | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.29% | ||
| AREC - AMR | -10% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| METCB - AMR | -12% Poorly correlated | -2.23% |
AREC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AREC has been loosely correlated with ABAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AREC jumps, then ABAT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AREC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AREC | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| ABAT - AREC | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
| AQMS - AREC | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
| METC - AREC | 41% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| METCB - AREC | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.23% | ||
| GWAV - AREC | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.65% | ||
More | ||||