AMRK
Price
$22.85
Change
+$1.96 (+9.38%)
Updated
Apr 9, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
701.41M
29 days until earnings call
BRPHF
Price
$9.26
Change
+$0.56 (+6.44%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
1.17B
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AMRK vs BRPHF

Header iconAMRK vs BRPHF Comparison
Open Charts AMRK vs BRPHFBanner chart's image
A-Mark Precious Metals
Price$22.85
Change+$1.96 (+9.38%)
Volume$8.34K
Capitalization701.41M
Galaxy Digital Holdings
Price$9.26
Change+$0.56 (+6.44%)
Volume$565.84K
Capitalization1.17B
AMRK vs BRPHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AMRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AMRK vs. BRPHF commentary
Apr 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AMRK is a Buy and BRPHF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 10, 2025
Stock price -- (AMRK: $20.89 vs. BRPHF: $9.26)
Brand notoriety: AMRK and BRPHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AMRK: 158% vs. BRPHF: 282%
Market capitalization -- AMRK: $701.41M vs. BRPHF: $1.17B
AMRK [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $701.41M. BRPHF’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $1.17B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AMRK’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBRPHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AMRK’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BRPHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AMRK is a better buy in the long-term than BRPHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AMRK’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BRPHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AMRK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BRPHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BRPHF is a better buy in the short-term than AMRK.

Price Growth

AMRK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -17.25% price change this week, while BRPHF (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -18.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +134.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

AMRK is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

BRPHF is expected to report earnings on Aug 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.89% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRPHF($1.17B) has a higher market cap than AMRK($701M). AMRK has higher P/E ratio than BRPHF: AMRK (6.82) vs BRPHF (2.85). AMRK YTD gains are higher at: -23.224 vs. BRPHF (-46.595). AMRK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 194M vs. BRPHF (-2.16M). AMRK has more cash in the bank: 28.5M vs. BRPHF (833K). BRPHF has less debt than AMRK: BRPHF (733M) vs AMRK (824M). AMRK has higher revenues than BRPHF: AMRK (10B) vs BRPHF (0).
AMRKBRPHFAMRK / BRPHF
Capitalization701M1.17B60%
EBITDA194M-2.16M-8,994%
Gain YTD-23.224-46.59550%
P/E Ratio6.822.85239%
Revenue10B0-
Total Cash28.5M833K3,421%
Total Debt824M733M112%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AMRK vs BRPHF: Fundamental Ratings
AMRK
BRPHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5370
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4470
SMR RATING
1..100
7016
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8892
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
252
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AMRK's Valuation (24) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BRPHF (64) in the null industry. This means that AMRK’s stock grew somewhat faster than BRPHF’s over the last 12 months.

AMRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BRPHF (70) in the null industry. This means that AMRK’s stock grew similarly to BRPHF’s over the last 12 months.

BRPHF's SMR Rating (16) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMRK (70) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BRPHF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMRK’s over the last 12 months.

AMRK's Price Growth Rating (88) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as BRPHF (92) in the null industry. This means that AMRK’s stock grew similarly to BRPHF’s over the last 12 months.

BRPHF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as AMRK (25) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that BRPHF’s stock grew similarly to AMRK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AMRKBRPHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AMRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BRPHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARRRX13.08N/A
N/A
AB Global Real Estate Investment R
PPQMX4.82N/A
N/A
Principal MidCap Growth III R3
JMGZX35.88N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Growth R2
NRERX12.76N/A
N/A
Neuberger Berman Real Estate R3
JCCAX13.61N/A
N/A
JHancock Small Cap Core A

AMRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AMRK and TREE have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMRK and TREE's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AMRK
1D Price
Change %
AMRK100%
-0.93%
TREE - AMRK
30%
Poorly correlated
-5.14%
RILY - AMRK
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.89%
BRPHF - AMRK
27%
Poorly correlated
+6.47%
VOYA - AMRK
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.24%
SF - AMRK
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.57%
More

BRPHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRPHF has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRPHF jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRPHF
1D Price
Change %
BRPHF100%
+6.47%
COIN - BRPHF
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
HIVE - BRPHF
63%
Loosely correlated
-7.75%
HUT - BRPHF
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
RIOT - BRPHF
59%
Loosely correlated
-8.02%
MARA - BRPHF
59%
Loosely correlated
-6.57%
More