It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +2.11% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.66%.
AMS is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
AMS | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AMS | BKCI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago78% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago77% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | 2 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago75% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago73% | 13 days ago79% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago64% | 2 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago70% | 2 days ago74% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BKCI and VRN have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BKCI and VRN's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BKCI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BKCI | 100% | -0.07% | ||
VRN - BKCI | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.43% | ||
MRK - BKCI | 8% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
PRU - BKCI | 7% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
OR - BKCI | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
AMS - BKCI | -1% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
More |