It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFMS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AMS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FMS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
AMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while FMS (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was +2.43% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.31%.
AMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.
FMS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2024.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
AMS | FMS | AMS / FMS | |
Capitalization | 18.5M | 11.2B | 0% |
EBITDA | 7.01M | 3.21B | 0% |
Gain YTD | 29.865 | -1.987 | -1,503% |
P/E Ratio | 41.86 | 20.80 | 201% |
Revenue | 20.7M | 19.5B | 0% |
Total Cash | 14.5M | 1.54B | 1% |
Total Debt | 13.4M | 12.1B | 0% |
AMS | FMS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 13 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 54 Fair valued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 52 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FMS's Valuation (11) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMS (54). This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMS’s over the last 12 months.
AMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMS (100). This means that AMS’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
AMS's SMR Rating (52) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FMS (85). This means that AMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than FMS’s over the last 12 months.
AMS's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is in the same range as FMS (58). This means that AMS’s stock grew similarly to FMS’s over the last 12 months.
FMS's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Medical Or Nursing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AMS (99). This means that FMS’s stock grew somewhat faster than AMS’s over the last 12 months.
AMS | FMS | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago68% | 2 days ago46% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago58% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago45% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago58% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago74% | 2 days ago60% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago65% | 9 days ago58% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago58% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
PAXG.X | 2510.047900 | 10.063477 | +0.40% |
PAX Gold cryptocurrency | |||
NTSE | 30.15 | 0.09 | +0.31% |
WisdomTree Emerging Mkts Effcnt Cr ETF | |||
TAGG | 43.76 | 0.09 | +0.21% |
T. Rowe Price QM US Bond ETF | |||
AGOX | 27.71 | N/A | N/A |
Adaptive Alpha Opportunities ETF | |||
SDOG | 57.75 | -0.26 | -0.44% |
ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AMS and SEM have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AMS and SEM's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AMS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AMS | 100% | -0.64% | ||
SEM - AMS | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
BKD - AMS | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.29% | ||
PNTG - AMS | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.91% | ||
BACK - AMS | 10% Poorly correlated | +3.03% | ||
HCA - AMS | 8% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
More |