Ad is loading...
ANFVX vs SSGSX
ANFVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANFVX vs SSGSX
Virtus NFJ Small-Cap Value R6
Price$14.05
Change+$0.30 (+2.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets247.4M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$41.78
Change+$0.72 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
ANFVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANFVX vs. SSGSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANFVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. ANFVX (247M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ANFVX: SSGSX (0.54) vs ANFVX (0.23). ANFVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ANFVX (11 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than ANFVX (0.82). ANFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANFVX: SSGSX (2500) vs ANFVX (2500000). ANFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.16 vs. SSGSX (-13.71). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 20.02 vs. ANFVX (17.35).
| ANFVX | SSGSX | ANFVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.26 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.26 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -11.519 | -11.566 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 2500 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 5.44B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.54 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.16 | -13.71 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.65 | -10.63 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 17.35 | 20.02 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -47.07 | 5.67 | -830% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...