Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANFVX vs SSGSX
ANFVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ANFVX vs SSGSX
Virtus NFJ Small-Cap Value R6
Price$14.42
Change-$0.28 (-1.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets252.31M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.53
Change-$0.78 (-1.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
ANFVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANFVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANFVX is a Hold and SSGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. ANFVX (252M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ANFVX: SSGSX (0.52) vs ANFVX (0.22). ANFVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ANFVX (11 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than ANFVX (0.82). ANFVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANFVX: SSGSX (2500) vs ANFVX (2500000). ANFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.77 vs. SSGSX (-8.36). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 21.72 vs. ANFVX (18.87).
| ANFVX | SSGSX | ANFVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.26 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 1.26 | 65% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.207 | -8.400 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500000 | 2500 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 252M | 5.52B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.52 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.77 | -8.36 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.36 | -3.90 | 60% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.87 | 21.72 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -45.03 | 7.10 | -635% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement