ANLBF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
APCOF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Updated
Oct 22 closing price
Ad is loading...

ANLBF vs APCOF

Header iconANLBF vs APCOF Comparison
Open Charts ANLBF vs APCOFBanner chart's image
Anton Res
Price$0.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
CapitalizationN/A
AMERICAN POTASH CORP. NEW
Price$0.07
Change-$0.01 (-12.50%)
Volume$30K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
ANLBF vs APCOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
ANLBF vs. APCOF commentary
Oct 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANLBF is a Hold and APCOF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 23, 2024
Stock price -- (ANLBF: $0.14 vs. APCOF: $0.07)
Brand notoriety: ANLBF and APCOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ANLBF: 23% vs. APCOF: 138%
Market capitalization -- ANLBF: $24M vs. APCOF: $2.89M
ANLBF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $24M. APCOF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ANLBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileAPCOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ANLBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • APCOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ANLBF is a better buy in the long-term than APCOF.

Price Growth

ANLBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while APCOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -4.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+1.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANLBF($24M) has a higher market cap than APCOF($2.89M). APCOF YTD gains are higher at: 202.727 vs. ANLBF (-8.452). APCOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.23M vs. ANLBF (-6.71M). ANLBF has more cash in the bank: 613K vs. APCOF (154K). APCOF has less debt than ANLBF: APCOF (125K) vs ANLBF (10.3M). ANLBF (0) and APCOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
ANLBFAPCOFANLBF / APCOF
Capitalization24M2.89M830%
EBITDA-6.71M-1.23M547%
Gain YTD-8.452202.727-4%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash613K154K398%
Total Debt10.3M125K8,240%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ANLBF vs APCOF: Fundamental Ratings
ANLBF
APCOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4492
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10057
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ANLBF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for APCOF (99). This means that ANLBF’s stock grew significantly faster than APCOF’s over the last 12 months.

APCOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANLBF (100). This means that APCOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANLBF’s over the last 12 months.

APCOF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as ANLBF (100). This means that APCOF’s stock grew similarly to ANLBF’s over the last 12 months.

ANLBF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as APCOF (36). This means that ANLBF’s stock grew similarly to APCOF’s over the last 12 months.

ANLBF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as APCOF (100). This means that ANLBF’s stock grew similarly to APCOF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL235.860.86
+0.37%
Apple
BTC.X67361.410000-6.445312
-0.01%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY583.32-1.27
-0.22%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA217.97-2.73
-1.24%
Tesla
GME20.93-0.29
-1.37%
GameStop Corp

ANLBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANLBF has been loosely correlated with ZZZOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANLBF jumps, then ZZZOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ANLBF
1D Price
Change %
ANLBF100%
N/A
ZZZOF - ANLBF
44%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NDMCF - ANLBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PLLTL - ANLBF
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.63%
ATLMF - ANLBF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARREF - ANLBF
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More

APCOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APCOF and ANLDF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APCOF and ANLDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APCOF
1D Price
Change %
APCOF100%
N/A
ANLDF - APCOF
3%
Poorly correlated
-15.15%
ANLBF - APCOF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARREF - APCOF
1%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
ANGCF - APCOF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AOTVF - APCOF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+43.46%
More