ANLBF vs NDMCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANLBF is a Hold and NDMCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANLBF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNDMCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ANLBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- NDMCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANLBF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NDMCF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ANLBF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- NDMCF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
Price Growth
ANLBF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NDMCF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| ANLBF | NDMCF | ANLBF / NDMCF | |
| Capitalization | 24M | 426K | 5,634% |
| EBITDA | -6.71M | -129.78K | 5,172% |
| Gain YTD | -4.774 | -64.550 | 7% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 613K | 351 | 174,644% |
| Total Debt | 10.3M | 6.25K | 164,800% |
ANLBF | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ANLBF | NDMCF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 18% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 19% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AOTG | 47.02 | 0.25 | +0.54% |
| AOT Growth and Innovation ETF | |||
| NOCT | 52.06 | -0.05 | -0.10% |
| Innovator Growth-100 Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct | |||
| HAUS | 19.17 | -0.15 | -0.79% |
| Residential REIT ETF | |||
| FV | 61.56 | -0.50 | -0.81% |
| First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF | |||
| UCO | 26.31 | -0.33 | -1.24% |
| ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | |||
ANLBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANLBF has been loosely correlated with ZZZOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANLBF jumps, then ZZZOF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANLBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANLBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZZZOF - ANLBF | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| NDMCF - ANLBF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PLLTL - ANLBF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.05% | ||
| ATLMF - ANLBF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BKIRF - ANLBF | 22% Poorly correlated | -10.60% | ||
More | ||||
NDMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDMCF has been loosely correlated with ATLMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NDMCF jumps, then ATLMF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDMCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ATLMF - NDMCF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| UURAF - NDMCF | 34% Loosely correlated | -5.43% | ||
| ANLBF - NDMCF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LCGMF - NDMCF | 28% Poorly correlated | -2.96% | ||
| NEXA - NDMCF | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||