ANNSF vs BJCHY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANNSF is a Hold and BJCHY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANNSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBJCHY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ANNSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- BJCHY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
ANNSF (@Other Transportation) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while BJCHY (@Other Transportation) price change was -1.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was -3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.50%.
Reported Earning Dates
BJCHY is expected to report earnings on Apr 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Transportation (-3.05% weekly)Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.
| ANNSF | BJCHY | ANNSF / BJCHY | |
| Capitalization | 24B | 2.99B | 803% |
| EBITDA | 2.54B | -3.33B | -76% |
| Gain YTD | 7.769 | 29.032 | 27% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.67 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 4.64B | 2.7B | 172% |
| Total Cash | 1.27B | 991M | 128% |
| Total Debt | 8.1B | 7.78B | 104% |
ANNSF | BJCHY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 37 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ANNSF's Valuation (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BJCHY (79). This means that ANNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BJCHY’s over the last 12 months.
ANNSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BJCHY (100). This means that ANNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BJCHY’s over the last 12 months.
ANNSF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BJCHY (95). This means that ANNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BJCHY’s over the last 12 months.
BJCHY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as ANNSF (46). This means that BJCHY’s stock grew similarly to ANNSF’s over the last 12 months.
BJCHY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANNSF (51). This means that BJCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANNSF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GSUS | 81.89 | 1.24 | +1.54% |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US Equity ETF | |||
| PCGG | 12.01 | 0.12 | +1.03% |
| Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | |||
| RYLG | 22.03 | 0.19 | +0.87% |
| Global X Russell 2000 Cov Cl & Gr ETF | |||
| TAXF | 50.84 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| American Century Divers Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| FLMX | 24.81 | -0.10 | -0.41% |
| Franklin FTSE Mexico ETF | |||
ANNSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANNSF has been loosely correlated with ANYYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANNSF jumps, then ANYYY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANNSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANNSF | 100% | -0.95% | ||
| ANYYY - ANNSF | 41% Loosely correlated | +2.14% | ||
| AIPUY - ANNSF | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ARRPY - ANNSF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASRMF - ANNSF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| JOBY - ANNSF | 7% Poorly correlated | +3.70% | ||
More | ||||
BJCHY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BJCHY and BJCHF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BJCHY and BJCHF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BJCHY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJCHY | 100% | N/A | ||
| BJCHF - BJCHY | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FLGZY - BJCHY | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AIPUY - BJCHY | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ANNSF - BJCHY | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.95% | ||
| AUKNY - BJCHY | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||