ANNSF vs CHRRF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANNSF is a Hold and CHRRF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ANNSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCHRRF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ANNSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CHRRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ANNSF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CHRRF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ANNSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- CHRRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
ANNSF (@Other Transportation) experienced а +2.87% price change this week, while CHRRF (@Other Transportation) price change was +6.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was -0.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.79%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Transportation (-0.03% weekly)Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.
| ANNSF | CHRRF | ANNSF / CHRRF | |
| Capitalization | 24B | 291M | 8,247% |
| EBITDA | 2.54B | 503M | 506% |
| Gain YTD | 5.875 | -5.556 | -106% |
| P/E Ratio | 17.67 | 6.11 | 289% |
| Revenue | 4.64B | 1.68B | 276% |
| Total Cash | 1.27B | 86M | 1,474% |
| Total Debt | 8.1B | 1.76B | 461% |
ANNSF | CHRRF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 38 Fair valued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 5 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ANNSF's Valuation (38) in the null industry is in the same range as CHRRF (67). This means that ANNSF’s stock grew similarly to CHRRF’s over the last 12 months.
ANNSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the null industry is in the same range as CHRRF (100). This means that ANNSF’s stock grew similarly to CHRRF’s over the last 12 months.
ANNSF's SMR Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CHRRF (94). This means that ANNSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CHRRF’s over the last 12 months.
ANNSF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as CHRRF (59). This means that ANNSF’s stock grew similarly to CHRRF’s over the last 12 months.
CHRRF's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ANNSF (61). This means that CHRRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ANNSF’s over the last 12 months.
| ANNSF | CHRRF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 70% | 24 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 68% | 24 days ago 55% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 62% | 24 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 60% | 24 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 57% | 24 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 65% | 30 days ago 66% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 25 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 60% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 46% | 24 days ago 69% |
ANNSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ANNSF has been loosely correlated with ANYYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ANNSF jumps, then ANYYY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ANNSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ANNSF | 100% | +2.79% | ||
| ANYYY - ANNSF | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| AIPUY - ANNSF | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ARRPY - ANNSF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ASRMF - ANNSF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CHRRF - ANNSF | 9% Poorly correlated | +4.08% | ||
More | ||||
CHRRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CHRRF and JOBY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CHRRF and JOBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CHRRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHRRF | 100% | +4.08% | ||
| JOBY - CHRRF | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
| ASR - CHRRF | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.63% | ||
| PAC - CHRRF | 25% Poorly correlated | +2.55% | ||
| BLDE - CHRRF | 24% Poorly correlated | +1.80% | ||
| OMAB - CHRRF | 24% Poorly correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||