Ad is loading...
ANWFX vs FCGIX
ANWFX vs FCGIX Comparison
Open Charts ANWFX vs FCGIX
American Funds New Perspective F2
Price$60.84
Change+$1.16 (+1.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets134.95B
NYLI PineStone Global Equity
Price$18.56
Change+$0.27 (+1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.45M
ANWFX vs FCGIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWFX vs. FCGIX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWFX is a Buy and FCGIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWFX has more cash in the bank: 135B vs. FCGIX (41.5M). ANWFX pays higher dividends than FCGIX: ANWFX (0.80) vs FCGIX (0.44). ANWFX was incepted earlier than FCGIX: ANWFX (17 years) vs FCGIX (8 years). FCGIX (1.49) is less costly to investors than ANWFX (0.52). ANWFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 24.00 vs. FCGIX (7.00). ANWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCGIX: ANWFX (250) vs FCGIX (1000000). ANWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.90 vs. FCGIX (-3.94). FCGIX return over 5 years is better than : 49.36 vs. ANWFX (43.59).
| ANWFX | FCGIX | ANWFX / FCGIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 0.85 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.52 | 1.49 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.920 | -5.478 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 135B | 41.5M | 325,301% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.80 | 0.44 | 180% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.90 | -3.94 | -23% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.26 | 6.17 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.59 | 49.36 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.46 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...