Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ANWPX vs FWTFX
ANWPX vs FWTFX Comparison
Open Charts ANWPX vs FWTFX
American Funds New Perspective A
Price$69.92
Change-$0.42 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets155.64B
Fidelity Advisor Worldwide M
Price$35.75
Change-$0.22 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.28B
ANWPX vs FWTFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ANWPX vs. FWTFX commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ANWPX is a Buy and FWTFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ANWPX has more cash in the bank: 156B vs. FWTFX (3.28B). ANWPX pays higher dividends than FWTFX: ANWPX (0.51) vs FWTFX (0.31). ANWPX was incepted earlier than FWTFX: ANWPX (52 years) vs FWTFX (16 years). FWTFX (1.23) is less costly to investors than ANWPX (0.73). FWTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 108.00 vs. ANWPX (24.00). ANWPX initial investment is less costly to investors than FWTFX (4%) vs FWTFX (4%). FWTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than ANWPX: FWTFX (0) vs ANWPX (250). ANWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.71 vs. FWTFX (-4.89). ANWPX return over 5 years is better than : 40.98 vs. FWTFX (19.78).
| ANWPX | FWTFX | ANWPX / FWTFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.23 | 59% |
| Fund Existence | 52 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.574 | 6.704 | 188% |
| Front Load | 6% | 4% | 164% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 156B | 3.28B | 4,753% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 0.31 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.71 | -4.89 | -198% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.18 | 38.59 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.98 | 19.78 | 207% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.86 | 51.12 | 160% |