AOTUF
Price
$0.68
Change
-$0.05 (-6.85%)
Updated
Jul 12 closing price
ARSSF
Price
$0.49
Change
-$0.01 (-2.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

AOTUF vs ARSSF

Header iconAOTUF vs ARSSF Comparison
Open Charts AOTUF vs ARSSFBanner chart's image
Precinct Properties New Zealand
Price$0.68
Change-$0.05 (-6.85%)
Volume$6K
CapitalizationN/A
Assura
Price$0.49
Change-$0.01 (-2.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
AOTUF vs ARSSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ARSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOTUF vs. ARSSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOTUF is a Buy and ARSSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AOTUF: $0.68 vs. ARSSF: $0.49)
Brand notoriety: AOTUF and ARSSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOTUF: 100% vs. ARSSF: 11%
Market capitalization -- AOTUF: $1.24B vs. ARSSF: $1.81B
AOTUF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.24B. ARSSF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOTUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileARSSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AOTUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ARSSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AOTUF and ARSSF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARSSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ARSSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AOTUF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ARSSF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -7.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -3.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-3.53% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARSSF($1.81B) has a higher market cap than AOTUF($1.24B). AOTUF has higher P/E ratio than ARSSF: AOTUF (31.95) vs ARSSF (13.64). AOTUF YTD gains are higher at: -13.321 vs. ARSSF (-24.462). AOTUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 119M vs. ARSSF (-92.4M). ARSSF has more cash in the bank: 118M vs. AOTUF (11.5M). ARSSF has less debt than AOTUF: ARSSF (1.25B) vs AOTUF (1.33B). AOTUF has higher revenues than ARSSF: AOTUF (179M) vs ARSSF (150M).
AOTUFARSSFAOTUF / ARSSF
Capitalization1.24B1.81B69%
EBITDA119M-92.4M-129%
Gain YTD-13.321-24.46254%
P/E Ratio31.9513.64234%
Revenue179M150M119%
Total Cash11.5M118M10%
Total Debt1.33B1.25B106%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOTUF: Fundamental Ratings
AOTUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
45
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
1
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AOTUFARSSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ARSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JPIVX30.05-0.78
-2.53%
JPMorgan U.S. Applied Data Sci Val I
HUDIX23.45-0.66
-2.74%
Huber Large Cap Value Inv
NSGAX22.04-0.72
-3.16%
Columbia Select Large Cap Equity A
VINAX130.95-4.72
-3.48%
Vanguard Industrials Index Admiral
LMGCX14.39-0.71
-4.70%
Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities C

AOTUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AOTUF has been loosely correlated with FRLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AOTUF jumps, then FRLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOTUF
1D Price
Change %
AOTUF100%
N/A
FRLOF - AOTUF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CGIUF - AOTUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRLAF - AOTUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARSSF - AOTUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWFF - AOTUF
0%
Poorly correlated
-5.46%
More

ARSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARSSF has been loosely correlated with CRPLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARSSF jumps, then CRPLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARSSF
1D Price
Change %
ARSSF100%
N/A
CRPLF - ARSSF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
STKAF - ARSSF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MAPGF - ARSSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MPCMF - ARSSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTBIF - ARSSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.76%
More