AOTUF
Price
$0.66
Change
-$0.08 (-10.81%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
BRLAF
Price
$4.41
Change
-$0.81 (-15.52%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
4.03B
Ad is loading...

AOTUF vs BRLAF

Header iconAOTUF vs BRLAF Comparison
Open Charts AOTUF vs BRLAFBanner chart's image
Precinct Properties New Zealand
Price$0.66
Change-$0.08 (-10.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.24B
British Land Company (The)
Price$4.41
Change-$0.81 (-15.52%)
Volume$183
Capitalization4.03B
AOTUF vs BRLAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOTUF vs. BRLAF commentary
Apr 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOTUF is a Hold and BRLAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AOTUF: $0.66 vs. BRLAF: $4.41)
Brand notoriety: AOTUF and BRLAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOTUF: 7% vs. BRLAF: 6%
Market capitalization -- AOTUF: $1.24B vs. BRLAF: $4.03B
AOTUF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.24B. BRLAF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $4.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.41B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOTUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBRLAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AOTUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • BRLAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AOTUF and BRLAF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

AOTUF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BRLAF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was +3.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.93%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (+3.83% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BRLAF($4.03B) has a higher market cap than AOTUF($1.24B). AOTUF has higher P/E ratio than BRLAF: AOTUF (31.95) vs BRLAF (6.28). BRLAF YTD gains are higher at: 5.755 vs. AOTUF (-2.293). AOTUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 119M vs. BRLAF (-944M). BRLAF has more cash in the bank: 125M vs. AOTUF (11.5M). AOTUF has less debt than BRLAF: AOTUF (1.33B) vs BRLAF (2.39B). BRLAF has higher revenues than AOTUF: BRLAF (418M) vs AOTUF (179M).
AOTUFBRLAFAOTUF / BRLAF
Capitalization1.24B4.03B31%
EBITDA119M-944M-13%
Gain YTD-2.2935.755-40%
P/E Ratio31.956.28509%
Revenue179M418M43%
Total Cash11.5M125M9%
Total Debt1.33B2.39B55%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOTUF vs BRLAF: Fundamental Ratings
AOTUF
BRLAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5476
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AOTUF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLAF (76). This means that AOTUF’s stock grew similarly to BRLAF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as AOTUF (100). This means that BRLAF’s stock grew similarly to AOTUF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLAF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as AOTUF (95). This means that BRLAF’s stock grew similarly to AOTUF’s over the last 12 months.

BRLAF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as AOTUF (70). This means that BRLAF’s stock grew similarly to AOTUF’s over the last 12 months.

AOTUF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BRLAF (76). This means that AOTUF’s stock grew similarly to BRLAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CRSSX8.400.09
+1.08%
Catholic Rspnsbl Invstmnts Small-Cap Ins
SEMNX16.370.17
+1.05%
Hartford Schroders Emerging Mkts Eq I
VSFCX18.560.16
+0.87%
Federated Hermes Clover Small Value C
VIKSX10.480.06
+0.58%
Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth I
CLCRX19.840.11
+0.56%
Columbia Select Large Cap Equity Inst2

AOTUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AOTUF has been loosely correlated with FRLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AOTUF jumps, then FRLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOTUF
1D Price
Change %
AOTUF100%
N/A
FRLOF - AOTUF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CGIUF - AOTUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRLAF - AOTUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARSSF - AOTUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWFF - AOTUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

BRLAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BRLAF has been loosely correlated with JRFIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BRLAF jumps, then JRFIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BRLAF
1D Price
Change %
BRLAF100%
N/A
JRFIF - BRLAF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRUFF - BRLAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+5.61%
BTBIF - BRLAF
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSRTF - BRLAF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.08%
ARESF - BRLAF
16%
Poorly correlated
-3.66%
More