AOTUF
Price
$0.66
Change
-$0.08 (-10.81%)
Updated
Feb 20 closing price
Capitalization
1.24B
FRLOF
Price
$0.67
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
3.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AOTUF vs FRLOF

Header iconAOTUF vs FRLOF Comparison
Open Charts AOTUF vs FRLOFBanner chart's image
Precinct Properties New Zealand
Price$0.66
Change-$0.08 (-10.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.24B
FRASERS LOGISTICS & Commercial Trust
Price$0.67
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$13.06K
Capitalization3.47B
AOTUF vs FRLOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOTUF vs. FRLOF commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOTUF is a Hold and FRLOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AOTUF: $0.66 vs. FRLOF: $0.67)
Brand notoriety: AOTUF and FRLOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOTUF: 100% vs. FRLOF: 323%
Market capitalization -- AOTUF: $1.24B vs. FRLOF: $3.47B
AOTUF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $1.24B. FRLOF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $3.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOTUF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFRLOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AOTUF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FRLOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AOTUF and FRLOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRLOF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FRLOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

AOTUF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FRLOF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -0.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -0.62%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-0.62% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRLOF($3.47B) has a higher market cap than AOTUF($1.24B). AOTUF has higher P/E ratio than FRLOF: AOTUF (31.95) vs FRLOF (8.19). FRLOF YTD gains are higher at: -0.808 vs. AOTUF (-2.293). FRLOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 744M vs. AOTUF (119M). FRLOF has more cash in the bank: 151M vs. AOTUF (11.5M). AOTUF has less debt than FRLOF: AOTUF (1.33B) vs FRLOF (2.1B). FRLOF has higher revenues than AOTUF: FRLOF (422M) vs AOTUF (179M).
AOTUFFRLOFAOTUF / FRLOF
Capitalization1.24B3.47B36%
EBITDA119M744M16%
Gain YTD-2.293-0.808284%
P/E Ratio31.958.19390%
Revenue179M422M42%
Total Cash11.5M151M8%
Total Debt1.33B2.1B63%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOTUF: Fundamental Ratings
AOTUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AOTUFFRLOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
16%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRLOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LEVOX11.89N/A
N/A
Lazard US Equity Concentrated Open
SGARX25.56N/A
N/A
Virtus SGA Global Growth R6
BIICX10.39N/A
N/A
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Instl
MNDRX22.49N/A
N/A
MFS New Discovery R2
THGIX26.22N/A
N/A
Thornburg International Growth R6

AOTUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AOTUF has been loosely correlated with FRLOF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AOTUF jumps, then FRLOF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOTUF
1D Price
Change %
AOTUF100%
N/A
FRLOF - AOTUF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CGIUF - AOTUF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRLAF - AOTUF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARSSF - AOTUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWFF - AOTUF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FRLOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRLOF has been loosely correlated with AOTUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRLOF jumps, then AOTUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRLOF
1D Price
Change %
FRLOF100%
N/A
AOTUF - FRLOF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CGIUF - FRLOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHTH - FRLOF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PECO - FRLOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.63%
SEVN - FRLOF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
More